Hi, i'm stuck on the following, please can someone help? Let $E$ be a complex holomorphic vector bundle of rank r over a compact kahler manifold $M$, let me indicate $\mathcal{E}$ the associated locally free sheaf of $E$, let $\mathcal{F}$ be a coherent subsheaf of $\mathcal{E}$ of rank $0< p < r$ such that $\frac{\mathcal{E}}{\mathcal{F}}$ is torsion free. The inclusion map $j:\mathcal{F}\rightarrow \mathcal{E}$ induces a homomorphism of sheaves $det(j): det(\mathcal{F})=({\Lambda}^p\mathcal{F})^{** } \rightarrow ({\Lambda}^p\mathcal{E})^{**}$ (with * i mean the dual sheaf), $det(j)$ is injective outside the singularity set $S_{n-1}(\mathcal{F})\subset M$ (the set of points in which $\mathcal{F}$ is not free), writing the sequence: $0 \rightarrow ker(det(j))\rightarrow det(\mathcal{F})\rightarrow (\Lambda^{p}\mathcal{E})^{ ** }$ why the sheaf $ker(det(j))$ is a torsion sheaf?

Thank you in advance


1 Answer 1


Let's assume for simplicity that $M$ is a smooth, complex, projective variety.

The set of points where the coherent subsheaf $\mathcal{F}$ is not locally free is a proper closed subset of $M$ (Hartshorne, Algebraic Geometry, Chapter II, ex. 5.8), so the stalk of $ker(det(j))$ at the generic point is zero, i.e. it is a torsion sheaf.

Moreover, you can say more. Indeed, since $\mathcal{E}$ is locally free and $\mathcal{E} /\mathcal{F}$ is torsion-free, it follows that $\mathcal{F}$ is a reflexive sheaf (Hartshorne, Stable Reflexive Sheaves, Theorem 1.1), so it is locally free except along a closed subset of codimension $\geq 3$ (same reference, Corollary 1.4).

In particular, if $M$ is a curve or a surface then $ker(det(j))$ is zero.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Hi! Thank you for replying. I looked to hartshorne and it defines the torsion sheaf as the sheaf with the zero stalk at the generic point, i forgot to say that my definition (Kobayashi's) is: Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a coherent sheaf, $\sigma : \mathcal{F} \rightarrow \mathcal{F}^{ ** }$ the natural morphism into its double dual, $\mathcal{F}$ is a torsion sheaf if $ker(\sigma)=\mathcal{F}$, are the two definitions equivalent? $\endgroup$
    – Italo
    Commented Aug 16, 2010 at 13:39
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Yes, they are. More precisely, the kernel of your map $\sigma$ is equal to the torsion subsheaf of $\mathcal{F}$ in the sense of Hartshorne, see Stable Reflexive Sheaves p. 124. So $\sigma$ is the zero map if and only if $\mathcal{F}$ is a torsion sheaf (again, in the sense of Hartshorne). $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 16, 2010 at 21:42

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.