2
$\begingroup$

I have been reading Kassel's Quantum groups and there is something I can not understand.

In Section 4 of chapter $XX$, he introduces the notion of a Infinitesimal symmetric category, that is a strict tensor category $(\mathcal{S}, \bigotimes, I)$ in which all the Hom sets are vector spaces together with, for every object $V,W$ of $\mathcal{S}$, a symmetry $\sigma_{V,W}: V \otimes W \rightarrow W \otimes V $ and an infinitesimal braiding $t_{V,W} :V \otimes W \rightarrow V \otimes W$ having the following properties:

$$\sigma_{V,W} \circ t_{V,W} = t_{W,V} \circ \sigma_{V,W}$$

and

$$ t_{U,V\otimes W} = t_{U,V}\otimes \mathrm{id}_W + (\sigma_{U,V}\otimes \mathrm{id}_W)^{-1} \circ(\mathrm{id}_v \otimes t_{U,W}) \circ (\sigma_{U,V}\otimes \mathrm{id}_W).$$

He then claims that if the infinitesimal symmetric category category $\mathcal{S}$ also has a left duality $V \mapsto V^*$ with structure maps $b_V^0 : I \rightarrow V \otimes V^*$ and $d_V^0 : V^* \otimes V \rightarrow I$, then we have have $$t_{V,W} = \frac12 (C_{V\otimes W}- C_V \otimes \mathrm{id}_W- \mathrm{id}_V \otimes C_W)$$ where the $(C_V : V \rightarrow V)_V$ is a natural family of endomorphisms of $\mathcal{S}$ given by : $$ C_v = - \big(\mathrm{id}_V \otimes(d_v^0 \circ t_{V^*.V})\big) \circ (b_V^0 \otimes \mathrm{id}_V).$$

I simply do not see at all why this is true, so I would glad welcome so kind of explanation. I have tried something using the fact that $(\mathrm{id}_V \otimes d_V^0) \circ (b_V^0 \otimes \mathrm{id}_V) = \mathrm{id}_V$ but this has not been very successful.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Did you try drawing it ? This is fairly easy to prove using graphical calculus. The following example might help your intuition: let $g$ be a Lie algebra and $t\in S^2(g)^g$ where the superscript means $g$ invariant. Then $t$ induces an infinitesimal braided structure on $g$-mod. Now write $t=\sum e_i \otimes e^i$ where $e_i$ is a basis and $e^i$ the dual basis w.r.t the pairing induced by $t$. Then C is nothing but the associated Casimir element, i.e. $C=\frac12 \sum e_ie^i$ regarded as an element in $U(g)$ (ie you replace the tensor product by the product in $U(g)$). $\endgroup$ – Adrien Apr 3 '20 at 10:33
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for answer. I totally understand it when the category $\mathcal{S}$ is the module category for some Hopf algebra. My question is maybe to be understand in the most general setting possible, when we do not know much about $\mathcal{S}$. $\endgroup$ – Vik S. Apr 3 '20 at 11:00
1
$\begingroup$

Apologies for my terrible handwriting, but here is an image with a graphical proof. The first equality is one of the defining property of $t$, represented as a chord diagram, ie a dotted line between two strand (the other defining property is the obvious other version of that). For me it matter which side of a strand the dotted line is attached to, and switching from one to the other at a given vertex change the sign of the expression. Then there is the definition of $c$ (which I realize is a bit different but equivalent to yours, the end dotted line can be moved to the rightmost strand at the cost of a sign), and a computation of $c_{U\otimes V}$ which should give what you want.

Image here

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.