2
$\begingroup$

Let $\phi:\Sigma^2\to M^3$ an conformal isometric immersion into a Riemannian 3-manifold $(M,g)$.

I would like to know what kind of informations is preserved (about the immersion) when we change $g$ by $e^f g$.

For example, since $g$ is in the same conformal class of $e^fg$ then $\phi:\Sigma^2\to M^3$ is also an conformal isometric immersion into $(M,e^fg)$.

If we suppose that $\Sigma$ is an oriented Riemannian surface, is it possible to relate the normal vector field of $\phi(\Sigma)$ into $(M,g)$ and of $(M,e^f g)$?

If $:\Sigma^2\to (M^3,g)$ has constant mean curvature then $\phi:\Sigma^2\to (M^3,e^fg)$ has constant mean curvature too?

I appreciate any help and book recommendations.

$\endgroup$
5
$\begingroup$

In general, having constant mean curvature is not preserved. This can be seen by a direct computation, or by looking at examples: The round metric on the 3-sphere without a point is conformal to flat 3-space. The Clifford torus in the 3-sphere (even without a point) is minimal, hence of constant mean curvature, and embedded. After stereographic projection the Clifford torus is not of constant mean curvature, as you can prove by computation, or from Alexandrovs theorem: There are no compact embedded CMC surfaces in euclidean 3-space besides the round sphere.

The functional which is invariant under conformal change of the ambient metric is the Willmore functional (and not the area functional): $$\mathcal W(\phi)=\int_\Sigma (H^2-K+\bar K )dA,$$ where $H$ is the mean curvature, $K$ is the curvature of the induced metric, $\bar K$ is the sectional curvature of the tangent plane of $\phi$ and $dA$ is the area form, all w.r.t. to the metric $g.$ But in fact, the integrand $(H^2-K+\bar K )dA$ is invariant under conformal changes of the metric. This was known by Sophie Germain, Blaschke and others for Moebius transformations, but first shown in the general case by "B.Y. Chen, Some conforaml invariants of submanifolds and their applications, Bol. Un. Mat. Ital, (1974)", see also Joel Weiner: On a probelm of Chen, Willmore et.al., Indiana Math Journal (78).

As a first consequence, being a Willmore surface, i.e., a critical point for the Willmore functional, is invariant under conformal changes of the metric. It is possible to define the Willmore functional for surfaces into the conformal 3-sphere without any reference to a Riemannian metric on the 3-sphere, see e.g. the work of Burstall, Pinkall and Pedit.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ big thanks for your comments. Do you have any information about the normal vector field? Because, when $\Sigma$ is oriented, then we can suppose that the normal of the two immersion are the same, I guess. $\endgroup$ – Irddo Feb 14 at 8:27
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The proof of the invariance of the Willmore functional under conformal changes of the ambient metric is based on the fact that the oriented normals of the surface with respect to two conformal metrics are scalings of each other. $\endgroup$ – Sebastian Feb 17 at 8:27

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.