1
$\begingroup$

Let $\mathbf{A}$ and $\mathbf{U}$ be arbitrary complex $M\times N$ and $N\times M$ matrices, respectively. Let denote superscript $(\cdot)^{\dagger}$ and $(\cdot)^{\mathrm{H}}$ as pseudo-inverse and conjugate-transpose operations. Then, is there any close-form solution for the following minimax optimization problem: $$\min_{\mathbf{U}}\max_n [(\mathbf{A}^{\dagger}+\mathbf{B}\mathbf{U})(\mathbf{A}^{\dagger}+\mathbf{B}\mathbf{U})^{\mathrm{H}}]_{n,n},$$ where $\mathbf{B}=\mathbf{I}-\mathbf{A}^{\dagger}\mathbf{A}$ and denotes the $n$th diagonal entries of matrix, and $\mathbf{I}$ is the identity matrix.

Is there any propose for choosing $\mathbf{U}$ to have $$\max_n [(\mathbf{A}^{\dagger}+\mathbf{B}\mathbf{U})(\mathbf{A}^{\dagger}+\mathbf{B}\mathbf{U})^{\mathrm{H}}]_{n,n}<\max_n [\mathbf{A}^{\dagger}(\mathbf{A}^{\dagger})^{\mathrm{H}}]_{n,n}.$$

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ Maybe it would be helpful to include some motivation for this problem? $\endgroup$
    – Hans
    Commented Feb 20, 2020 at 16:03
  • $\begingroup$ is $U$ $N\times N$? Otherwise there seems to be a problem. $\endgroup$
    – user35593
    Commented Feb 21, 2020 at 10:26
  • $\begingroup$ $U=0$ seems to work. $\endgroup$
    – user35593
    Commented Feb 21, 2020 at 10:26
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry I meant $M \times N$ $\endgroup$
    – user35593
    Commented Feb 21, 2020 at 10:28
  • $\begingroup$ I correct the pointed problems. $\endgroup$
    – Math_Y
    Commented Feb 21, 2020 at 10:32

0

You must log in to answer this question.