2
$\begingroup$

Let $R\subset S$ be commutative rings, $I\trianglelefteq R$ an ideal and $M$ be an $R$-module. Suppose that

1) $R$ is Noetherian and $I$-adically complete.

2) $M$ is a finite $R$-module (hence $M$ is $I$-adically complete)

3) $S$ is a flat $R$-algebra.

4) $S$ is $I$-adically complete

5) $M/IM$ is free module over $R/I$,

Is it true that under the above assumptions $S\otimes_{R}M$ is $I$-adically complete?

I am only able to prove the above under the assumption that

6) $\operatorname{Tor}^{R}_{i}(R/I^n,M)=0$ for all $i,n>0$ in the following way:

Consider a resolution of $M$ in $R$-$\operatorname{Mod}$ $$\ldots \rightarrow R^{\oplus m_2}\rightarrow R^{\oplus m_1}\rightarrow R^{\oplus m_0}\rightarrow M\rightarrow 0$$ by finite free modules. Applying $-\otimes_{R}R/I^n$ we obtain an exact sequence $$\ldots \rightarrow R^{\oplus m_1}/I^n R^{\oplus m_1}\rightarrow R^{\oplus m_0}/I^n R^{\oplus m_0} \rightarrow M/I^nM\rightarrow 0$$ using our extra assumption. Tensoring by $S$ over $R$ we obtain the exact sequences $$\ldots \rightarrow S^{\oplus m_1}/I^n S^{\oplus m_1}\rightarrow S^{\oplus m_0}/I^n S^{\oplus m_0} \rightarrow S\otimes_{R}M/I^n (S\otimes_{R}M)\rightarrow 0$$ by our assumption 3). Our systems satisfy the Mittag Leffler conditions and therefore taking projective limits and using 4) we conclude $\varprojlim_{m} S\otimes_{R}M/I^n (S\otimes_{R}M)$ is the cokernel of $S^{\oplus m_1}\rightarrow S^{\oplus m_0}$ hence it's isomorphic $S\otimes_{R}M$.

Can one show this without assumption 6) at least for the case when $I$ is principal, perhaps involving the second half of condition 1) and condition 5) ?

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

This follows by adapting the proof of Tag 00MA, even without assumption 5. We also don't need $S$ to be an algebra; a complete $R$-module suffices. Finally, we never use that $R$ is $I$-adically complete!

Indeed, by assumption 2 there exists a short exact sequence $0 \to K \to F \to M \to 0$ with $F$ finite free. By assumption 3, the sequence $$0 \to K_S \to F_S \to M_S \to 0$$ is exact, where $(-)_S = (-) \otimes_R S$. For each $n$, this gives a short exact sequence $$0 \to K_S/(I^nF_S \cap K_S) \to F_S/I^nF_S \to M_S/I^nM_S \to 0.$$ Since all systems satisfy the Mittag-Leffler condition, the limit sequence $$0 \to \lim_{\substack{\longleftarrow \\ n}} K_S/(I^nF_S \cap K_S) \to (F_S)^\wedge \to (M_S)^\wedge \to 0\label{Eq 1}\tag{1}$$ is exact. By the Artin–Rees lemma, there exists $c \geq 0$ such that $I^nK \subseteq I^nF \cap K \subseteq I^{n-c}K$ for all $n \geq c$. By flatness of $S$, for any $R$-module $N$ and any $n \in \mathbf Z_{\geq 0}$, the surjection $$N_S \twoheadrightarrow N_S/I^nN_S \cong (N/I^nN)_S$$ identifies $I^nN_S$ with $(I^nN)_S$ as submodules of $N_S$. Similarly, the map $$F_S \to F_S/I^nF_S \oplus F_S/K_S \cong (F/I^nF \oplus F/K)_S$$ identifies $I^nF_S \cap K_S$ with $(I^nF \cap K)_S$ as submodules of $F_S$. Thus, we conclude that $$I^nK_S \subseteq I^nF_S \cap K_S \subseteq I^{n-c}K_S$$ for all $n \geq c$. In particular, (\ref{Eq 1}) reads as $$0 \to (K_S)^\wedge \to (F_S)^\wedge \to (M_S)^\wedge \to 0.$$ We now get a commutative diagram with exact rows $$\begin{array}{ccccccccc}0 & \to & K_S & \to & F_S & \to & M_S & \to & 0 \\ & & \downarrow & & \downarrow & & \downarrow & & \\ 0 & \to & (K_S)^\wedge & \to & (F_S)^\wedge & \to & (M_S)^\wedge & \to & 0.\! \end{array}$$ By assumption 4, the middle vertical arrow is an isomorphism. This immediately implies that the right vertical arrow is surjective, and applying the same reasoning to $K$ gives the same statement for the left vertical arrow. Then the five lemma shows that all vertical maps are isomorphisms. $\square$

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.