3
$\begingroup$

Let $F$ be a non-singular integral quadratic form in four variables. Then a result of Heath-Brown from the 90's states for $m \to \infty$, $$|\{ x \in \mathbb{Z}^4 \,:\, F(x) = m \}| = C_F\sigma(F,m)m + O_{F,\varepsilon}(m^{\frac{3}{4} + \varepsilon}),$$ where $C_F$ is a positive constant depending only on $F$ and $\sigma(F,m)$ is the singular series.

I am interested to know, whether up till today there are improvements on the error rate of this result. More precisely, is there any hope to improve the error rate to $O_{F,\varepsilon}(m^{\frac{1}{2} + \varepsilon})$. If this is unknown, what is the conjectured error term?

For the application I have in mind, it would be already interesting to understand the case $$F(x) = x_1^2 + x_2^2 + x_3^2 + x_4^2.$$ Are there any results for this case or any other specific quadratic form?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Here is the original paper. core.ac.uk/display/77442361 Jayce Getz refined the error: doi.org/10.1112/jlms.12130 $\endgroup$ – MyNinthAccount Jan 30 at 11:15
  • $\begingroup$ @MyNinthAccount: As far as I understand, Getz is only proving results for the case where the sum is over F(x) = 0. $\endgroup$ – Constantin K Jan 30 at 11:35
  • $\begingroup$ You should ask separate questions as separate questions, don't make your question a moving target. If the original question has been answered to your satisfaction, then accept the answer; and if you want to ask a different question, do that separately. $\endgroup$ – Alex B. Feb 4 at 10:24
  • $\begingroup$ Ok – here is the new question: mathoverflow.net/questions/351915/… $\endgroup$ – Constantin K Feb 4 at 13:45
4
$\begingroup$

It follows from Deligne's bound for the Hecke eigenvalues of weight $2$ holomorphic cusp forms (which is really Eichler's theorem in this special case) that the error term is $O_{F,\varepsilon}(m^{\frac{1}{2} + \varepsilon})$. Indeed, as proved by Siegel, the main term is the Eisenstein contribution of the underlying theta series (which is a holomorphic modular form of weight $2$), so the error term is the cuspidal contribution.

In particular, for $F(x) = x_1^2 + x_2^2 + x_3^2 + x_4^2$ the error term is zero, since the main term in this case reproduces Jacobi's well-known formula $8\sum_{\substack{d\mid m\\4\nmid d}}d$ for the number of representations.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.