2
$\begingroup$

I have a function $P: \mathbb{R}^n \to \mathbb{R}^n$. This function satisfies: $$ P(\vec{x}) = J_P(\vec{x}) \cdot \vec{x}$$ where $\vec{x}\in \mathbb{R}^n$, $J_P$ is the Jacobian of $P$ and "$\cdot$" is the matrix-vector product. I would rougly describe it as in the title.

I guess that it is a well known property. Do you know what is its name? Can you suggest some literature about it, or any known property?

Also, I would like to to know about the symplectic equivalent: $$ P(\vec{x}) = -\Omega \cdot J_P(\vec{x}) \cdot \Omega \cdot \vec{x}$$ where $\Omega$ defines the symplectic form.

$\endgroup$
8
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Aren't all such functions just linear ? $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 20, 2020 at 10:21
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @FedericoPoloni but the derivative does not exist at zero. I thought the upper condition means differentiable everywhere and that equality holds. If it does not mean that, what are the implied differentiability assumptions for higher $n$. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 20, 2020 at 10:47
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I can't work out right now but this is closely related to the equation for homogeneous degree one functions: see "Euler's homogeneous function theorem" $\endgroup$
    – SBK
    Commented Jan 20, 2020 at 13:33
  • $\begingroup$ in fact maybe it is exactly that $\endgroup$
    – SBK
    Commented Jan 20, 2020 at 13:35
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The characteristic lines for this PDE are just the rays from the origin, and solving the corresponding ODE is exactly the proof of Euler Th.m on homogeneous functions. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 21, 2020 at 9:07

3 Answers 3

3
$\begingroup$

As for the symplectic case. Let $J$ be the symplectic matrix $J:=\left[ \matrix{ 0 & I_n \\ -I_n & 0 }\right]$. The characteristic lines for the (first order, linear, partial differential, vector) equation $$P(x)=-J \,{\rm d}P(x)J x, \qquad x\in\mathbb{R}^{2n}\setminus\{0\},$$ are the solutions of the ODE $\dot \xi=J\xi$, that is circles $\xi(t)=e^{tJ}x_0$. Along these characteristic lines, the equation is $\partial_t P(\xi(t))= {\rm d}P(\xi(t))J \xi(t)=JP(\xi(t))$, meaning that $P\circ \xi$ satisfies the same ODE, so that we have that $P(e^{tJ}x)=e^{tJ}P(x)$, for all $t\in\mathbb{R}$ and $x\in\mathbb{R}^{2n}\setminus\{0\}$, is a necessary and sufficient condition, for a differentiable map $P:\mathbb{R}^{2n}\setminus\{0\}\to\mathbb{R}^{2n}$, to satisfy your equation. We may use complex notation and identify $\mathbb{R}^{2n}$ with $\mathbb{C}^n$, $J$ with the multiplication by $-i$, and the operators $e^{tJ}$ with multiplication by the complex scalars of modulus $1$ (Warning: in doing so, we still consider real differentiability, not complex differentiability, i.e. the Fréchet differential ${\rm d}P(x)$ is an $\mathbb{R}$-linear map, not necessarily $\mathbb{C}$-linear, i.e. not assumed to commute with $J$). The condition then reads: $P$ is an equivariant map w.r.to the group action of $\mathbb{S}^1$:

$$P(\theta x)=\theta P(x)\quad\text{for all } x\in\mathbb{C}^n\setminus\{0\} \text{ and } \theta\in\mathbb{C} \text{ with } |\theta|=1.$$

for instance, in dimension $2$ (i.e. $n=1$) these differentiable maps $P:\mathbb{R}^2\setminus\{0\}\to\mathbb{R}^2$ are exactly those that in polar coordinates write as $P(r e^{it})=e^{it}\phi(r)$, where $\phi:\mathbb{R}_+\to\mathbb{R}$ is a differentiable map.

Rmk If one takes $J$ to be the identity map, and $P$ differentiable for any $x\ne0$, the same computation gives $P(tx)=tP(x)$ for all $t>0$ and $x\ne0$, that is, $P$ is (positively) homogeneous of degree $1$, (equivariant w.r.to the action of homoteties) If $P$ is also assumed to be defined and differentiable at $0$, this implies $P$ linear, as observed in comments.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ I modified a bit and removed the origin from the domain, which seems a more natural setting . $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 21, 2020 at 14:44
1
$\begingroup$

Such functions are linear. In dimension $1$, your equation means $$P(x)=P'(x)x$$ Solving this differential equation we obtain $P(x)=cx$. Now in arbitrary dimension, your condition can be written as $$x_j\sum_j \partial P/\partial x_j=P$$ for each coordinate $P$, which means that $P$ is a homogeneous function of degree $1$, by Euler's theorem,

http://www.its.caltech.edu/~kcborder/Notes/EulerHomogeneity.pdf

$\endgroup$
12
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @DorianoBrogioli Your example is not differentiable at the origin (which was implicitly assumed in the question). If $P:\mathbb{R}^n\to\mathbb{R}^n$ (or $P:X\to Y$ between normed spaces, more in general) is homogeneous of degree $1$ and differentiable at the origin, the remainder $P(x)-dP(0)x$ is also $1$-homogeneous, and since it is $o(x)$ for $x\to0$, it is identically zero, that is $P=dP(0)$ is linear. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 20, 2020 at 15:41
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @DorianoBrogioli Your original question talked of a function from $R^n$ to $R^n$ and the usual understanding among analysts is that "from $X$ to $Y$" means that the domain of the function is $X$. Maybe you had a slightly different question in mind, which could be asked separately? $\endgroup$
    – Yemon Choi
    Commented Jan 20, 2020 at 17:04
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @DorianoBrogioli I don't see that your example has domain $\mathbb R^2$. It's undefined along the line $x=-y$. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 20, 2020 at 17:53
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @DorianoBrogioli: the misunderstanding that Yemon Choi had in mind (I guess?) was that, when one writes "$f$ is a map from $X$ to $Y$", one usually means that $f$ is defined on the WHOLE space $X$. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 20, 2020 at 20:18
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Homogeneous function of degree $1$ can be defined everywhere on $R^n$, for example $x^3/(x^2+y^2)$, but they are usually not differentiable at the origin. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 21, 2020 at 12:33
1
$\begingroup$

I think this is the equation for a homogeneous degree one function; see "Euler's homogeneous function theorem".

If such a function is differentiable at the origin, then it has to be linear.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you and all the others who contributed, in particular @Alexandre Eremenko. Do you have any suggestion about the "symplectic version", maybe inspired by the analogy with the homogeneous functions? $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 21, 2020 at 9:38

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .