8
$\begingroup$

Let $X$ be a space with fundamental group $G$. Recall that the de Rham fundamental group of $X$ is the inverse limit of the Malcev completions of the nilpotent truncations of $G$. This has a Lie algebra, which I will denote by $\mathfrak{g}$. The Lie algebra $\mathfrak{g}$ has a natural filtration, and thus has an associated graded Lie algebra $\text{gr}\ \mathfrak{g}$. In the literature, I have seen two different definitions of what it means for $G$ to be formal:

  1. The Lie algbera $\mathfrak{g}$ is isomorphic to its associated graded $\text{gr}\ \mathfrak{g}$.

  2. The Lie algebra $\mathfrak{g}$ has a presentation with only quadratic relations.

There is also a notion of $X$ being formal:

  1. The minimal model of $X$ is quasi-isomorphic to the cohomology algebra (with the trivial differential).

I assume that 3 implies 1 and 2 (though presumably it is stronger).

Question: What is the precise relationship between the above notions? Is there a good place to read proofs of whatever implications exist?

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Clearly 2 implies 1, and the converse doesn't hold (for instance the 3-dimensional Heisenberg Lie algebra satisfies 1 and not 2). $\endgroup$ – YCor Jan 16 at 22:00
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ In addition to Denis excellent answer you might want to have a look at the very nice survey by Suciu-Wang in arxiv.org/abs/1504.08294 $\endgroup$ – Adrien Jan 17 at 9:21
4
$\begingroup$

There is a notion of $q$-equivalence between cdgas: it is a chain of morphisms each being isomorphism on cohomology in degrees $\leq q$ and monomorphism in degree $q+1$. Now, we call something $q$-formal if it is $q$-equivalent to its cohomology. Obviously, a space $X$ is $1$-formal if and only if $K(\pi_1(X), 1)$ is $1$-formal because killing homotopy groups map $X \to K(\pi_1(X), 1)$ is evidently an 1-equivalence.

Define holonomy algebra $hol(X)$ of a cdga as quotient of free Lie algebra on $(H^1)^*$ by ideal spanned by image of comultiplication $\mu^*: (H^2)^* \to (H^1)^* \wedge (H^1)^*$. It's obviously a graded quadratic Lie algebra.

Notice that 1-equivalences give isomorphisms on holonomy Lie algebras. So, for spaces, it depends only on fundamental group, because if you have $G \cong \pi_1(X) \cong \pi_1(Y)$, then both map into $K(G, 1)$ with maps being $1$-equivalences.

Malcev completion of a group $\mathfrak m (G)$ is defined as Lie algebra of primitive elements in $\lim_{\leftarrow} \Bbb QG/IG^n$ where $IG$ is augmentation ideal. There is a homomorphism from Magnus algebra of a group $L(G) := \bigoplus \gamma_kG/\gamma_{k+1}G \otimes \Bbb Q$ to Malcev algebra which becomes isomorphism after taking associated graded quotients, as proven by Quillen in paper On the associated graded ring of a group ring, 1968.

We have a theorem due to Sullivan.

$\square$ Space $X$ is $1$-formal if and only if degree completion of holonomy Lie algebra $hol(X)$ is filtered isomorphic to $\mathfrak m (\pi_1(X))$. $\square$

Good reference is two books by Felix, Halperin, Thomas, called (unsurprisingly) Rational homotopy theory I/II. 1-formality is very clearly explained in the beginning of second tome.


Now, to your question. If a space is formal, it is indeed $q$-formal for all $q$, in particular, 1, so your (3) implies both (2) and (1).

YCor mentioned in comments that (1) is strictly weaker as witnessed by integral Heisenberg group. More generally, every two-step nilpotent Lie algebra is isomorphic to its associated lower central quotient, but only virtually abelian nilpotent groups are 1-formal. (If some commutator $[a, b]$ is nontrivial and there are no relations in weight 3, then $[a, [a, b]]$ will be nontrivial).

Let's prove that (2) implies (3).

Suppose $\mathfrak m(G)$ is a completion of some quadratic algebra $E = FreeLie(V)/(R), R \subset \wedge^2 V$. Now, going back to Quillen, we have a homomorphism $L(G) \to \mathfrak m(G)$ which becomes isomorphism on associated graded (in particular, it's injective). As Malcev algebra was graded from the beginning, $L(G)$ inherits this grading, and the only thing it can be is $E$. From Sullivan's Infinitesimal computations in topology we know that kernel of Lie bracket induced by group commutator on $G_{ab} \wedge G_{ab}$ rationally isomorphic to image of comultiplication $\mu^*$, so $E \cong hol(G)$ q.e.d.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.