Let $P_0,\ldots,P_n$ denote the coordinate hyperplanes in $\mathbb P^n$, and suppose that in each $P_i$ I have a degree $d$ hypersurface $V_i$. I am trying to understand what is the obstruction to the existence of a degree $d$ hypersurface $V \subset \mathbb P^n$ such that $V \cap P_i = V_i$.

There are some obvious obstructions: for example, my prescribed hyperplane sections $V_i$ must agree on intersections so that $V_i \cap P_j = V_j \cap P_i$. I don't think this alone is quite sufficient. In the case $n=3$ for example, let $p = P_1 \cap P_2 \cap P_3$ and suppose that $V_1,V_2,V_3$ all go through this point. Then $T_p V_1 + T_p V_2 + T_p V_3$ had better have dimension $2$, not $3$.

I am sure there is some exact sequence I'm missing - what is it?

(note: of course $V$ does not have to be unique, at least if $d \geq n+1$. You can add monomials containing all of the variables to the defining equation, and it doesn't change the intersection of the resulting surface with the coordinate hyperplanes)


1 Answer 1


The condition $V_i \cap P_j = V_j \cap P_i$ (if understood properly) is the only obstruction. To see this denote by $Z$ the union of $P_i$. Then we have an exact sequnce $$ 0 \to \mathcal{O}_Z \to \bigoplus \mathcal{O}_{P_i} \to \bigoplus \mathcal{O}_{P_i \cap P_j} \to \bigoplus \mathcal{O}_{P_i \cap P_j \cap P_k} \to \dots $$ (such an exact sequence exists for any union of transverse hypersurfaces and can be proved by induction on the number of components). Tensoring it by $\mathcal{O}(d)$ one deduces an isomorphism $$ H^0(Z,\mathcal{O}_Z(d)) = \mathrm{Ker}\Big(\bigoplus H^0(P_i,\mathcal{O}_{P_i}(d)) \to \bigoplus H^0(P_i \cap P_j, \mathcal{O}_{P_i \cap P_j}(d)) \Big). $$ Thus, to give a section of $\mathcal{O}_Z(d)$ one needs to give a collection of sections of $\mathcal{O}_{P_i}(d)$ that agree on pairwise intersections (this is the right way to state the condition).

On the other hand, $Z$ is a hypersurface of degree $n+1$, hence there is an exact sequence $$ 0 \to \mathcal{O}(d-n-1) \to \mathcal{O}(d) \to \mathcal{O}_Z(d) \to 0 $$ on $\mathbb{P}^n$, and since $H^1(\mathbb{P}^n,\mathcal{O}(d-n-1)) = 0$ (I assume that $n \ge 2$), it follows that the morphism $$ H^0(\mathbb{P}^n, \mathcal{O}(d)) \to H^0(Z, \mathcal{O}_Z(d)) $$ is surjective, hence any such section lifts to an equation of a hypersurface in $\mathbb{P}^n$.

  • $\begingroup$ Thanks! This is a big help, but I'm still missing something. I really get the $V_i$ as elements of $\mathbb PH^0(P_i,\mathcal O(d))$, so I still need to be able to check whether they have lifts to $H^0(P_i,\mathcal O(d))$ that agree in the sense you describe. Is there any easy way to see this? $\endgroup$
    – Mark
    Jan 4, 2020 at 14:23
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @Mark: Consider the simplest example: $n = 2$, $d = 1$. You have a triangle of lines on $\mathbb{P}^2$. Imagine you have a point on each of the lines, away from their intersection points. This configuration of $V_i$ automatically satisfies your compatibility condition in the projectivized spaces of sections. But of course, not every such triple is collinear. $\endgroup$
    – Sasha
    Jan 4, 2020 at 21:17

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.