8
$\begingroup$

Let $P_0,\ldots,P_n$ denote the coordinate hyperplanes in $\mathbb P^n$, and suppose that in each $P_i$ I have a degree $d$ hypersurface $V_i$. I am trying to understand what is the obstruction to the existence of a degree $d$ hypersurface $V \subset \mathbb P^n$ such that $V \cap P_i = V_i$.

There are some obvious obstructions: for example, my prescribed hyperplane sections $V_i$ must agree on intersections so that $V_i \cap P_j = V_j \cap P_i$. I don't think this alone is quite sufficient. In the case $n=3$ for example, let $p = P_1 \cap P_2 \cap P_3$ and suppose that $V_1,V_2,V_3$ all go through this point. Then $T_p V_1 + T_p V_2 + T_p V_3$ had better have dimension $2$, not $3$.

I am sure there is some exact sequence I'm missing - what is it?

(note: of course $V$ does not have to be unique, at least if $d \geq n+1$. You can add monomials containing all of the variables to the defining equation, and it doesn't change the intersection of the resulting surface with the coordinate hyperplanes)

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

7
$\begingroup$

The condition $V_i \cap P_j = V_j \cap P_i$ (if understood properly) is the only obstruction. To see this denote by $Z$ the union of $P_i$. Then we have an exact sequnce $$ 0 \to \mathcal{O}_Z \to \bigoplus \mathcal{O}_{P_i} \to \bigoplus \mathcal{O}_{P_i \cap P_j} \to \bigoplus \mathcal{O}_{P_i \cap P_j \cap P_k} \to \dots $$ (such an exact sequence exists for any union of transverse hypersurfaces and can be proved by induction on the number of components). Tensoring it by $\mathcal{O}(d)$ one deduces an isomorphism $$ H^0(Z,\mathcal{O}_Z(d)) = \mathrm{Ker}\Big(\bigoplus H^0(P_i,\mathcal{O}_{P_i}(d)) \to \bigoplus H^0(P_i \cap P_j, \mathcal{O}_{P_i \cap P_j}(d)) \Big). $$ Thus, to give a section of $\mathcal{O}_Z(d)$ one needs to give a collection of sections of $\mathcal{O}_{P_i}(d)$ that agree on pairwise intersections (this is the right way to state the condition).

On the other hand, $Z$ is a hypersurface of degree $n+1$, hence there is an exact sequence $$ 0 \to \mathcal{O}(d-n-1) \to \mathcal{O}(d) \to \mathcal{O}_Z(d) \to 0 $$ on $\mathbb{P}^n$, and since $H^1(\mathbb{P}^n,\mathcal{O}(d-n-1)) = 0$ (I assume that $n \ge 2$), it follows that the morphism $$ H^0(\mathbb{P}^n, \mathcal{O}(d)) \to H^0(Z, \mathcal{O}_Z(d)) $$ is surjective, hence any such section lifts to an equation of a hypersurface in $\mathbb{P}^n$.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks! This is a big help, but I'm still missing something. I really get the $V_i$ as elements of $\mathbb PH^0(P_i,\mathcal O(d))$, so I still need to be able to check whether they have lifts to $H^0(P_i,\mathcal O(d))$ that agree in the sense you describe. Is there any easy way to see this? $\endgroup$
    – Mark
    Commented Jan 4, 2020 at 14:23
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @Mark: Consider the simplest example: $n = 2$, $d = 1$. You have a triangle of lines on $\mathbb{P}^2$. Imagine you have a point on each of the lines, away from their intersection points. This configuration of $V_i$ automatically satisfies your compatibility condition in the projectivized spaces of sections. But of course, not every such triple is collinear. $\endgroup$
    – Sasha
    Commented Jan 4, 2020 at 21:17

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .