Almost 5 years ago (time flies), I asked in Rankin-Selberg convolution and product of degrees whether the Rankin-Selberg convolution of two automorphic representations of respectively $\operatorname{GL}_{n}(\mathbb{A}_{\mathbb{Q}})$ and
$\operatorname{GL}_{n'}(\mathbb{A}_{\mathbb{Q}})$ gave rise to an automorphic representation of $\operatorname{GL}_{n.n'}(\mathbb{A}_{\mathbb{Q}})$. Paul Garrett answered it by giving the known cases where this was proven at that time.

Have there been breakthroughs so far getting us any closer to such a general result?

  • 5
    $\begingroup$ I don't think so. It's a hard problem. $\endgroup$ – Kimball Dec 25 '19 at 15:06

Newton and Thorne proved that if $\pi$ is a cuspidal automorphic representation of $\mathrm{GL}_2(\mathbb{A}_{\mathbb{Q}})$ corresponding with a holomorphic cuspidal newform of even integral weight $k\geq 2$, squarefree level, and trivial central character, then for each $n\geq 1$, the $n$-th symmetric power lift $\mathrm{Sym}^n \pi$ is a cuspidal automorphic representation of $\mathrm{GL}_{n+1}(\mathbb{A}_{\mathbb{Q}})$. We have the standard identity

$\mathrm{Sym}^n \pi\otimes\mathrm{Sym}^n\pi = \boxplus_{j=0}^n \mathrm{Sym}^{2j}\pi$,

so by Newton--Thorne, this is an isobaric automorphic representation of $\mathrm{GL}_{(n+1)^2}(\mathbb{A}_{\mathbb{Q}})$. This is not yet known to hold for $\pi$ corresponding with Hecke--Maass forms. Thus this is a thin set of examples, but I find it noteworthy nonetheless. This showed up on the arxiv the day before you posted your question.

| cite | improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much for your answer. Are there known important properties, even conjectural, that are stable under RS convolution ? $\endgroup$ – Sylvain JULIEN Mar 4 at 18:28

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.