3
$\begingroup$

Recall that a group G is said:

1) Sylow $\pi$-connected if the Sylow $\pi$-subgroups of G are conjugates in G.

2) Sylow $\pi$-integrated if every subgroup of G is Sylow $\pi$-connected.

3) Completely Sylow integrated if G is Sylow $\pi$-integrated for every set of primes $\pi$.

Now i found in some work (for example in Dixon or Hartley) that:

1) ''For by a well known theorem of P. Hall, a finite completely Sylow integrated group is soluble...''

2) ''...and so an arbitrary completely Sylow integrated group is locally soluble''.

I don't found nowhere a proof for 1); for 2) i must consider a finitely generated (and no necessarily finite) subgroup of a completely Sylow integrated group for proof the locally solubility? (pheraps G is assumed locally finite?)

Help me, please.

$\endgroup$
5
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Perhaps you could supply a few more definitions. What is a Sylow $\pi$-subgroup when $\pi$ is not prime? Is it the same as a Hall $\pi$-subgroup? $\endgroup$
    – Derek Holt
    Dec 3, 2019 at 11:22
  • $\begingroup$ Also, you should probably explain what you mean by a Sylow subgroup in an infinite group $\endgroup$ Dec 3, 2019 at 11:36
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Let a group G and a set of primes $\pi$. 1) An element $g\in G$ is said a $\pi$-element if $|\langle g\rangle|$ is finite and if prime divisors of $|\langle g\rangle|$ are in $\pi$. 2) G is said a $\pi$-group if every element of G is a $\pi$-element. 3) A Sylow $\pi$-subgroup of G is a maximal element in the ordered set ({P$\le$ G: P is a $\pi$-group},$\subseteq$) $\endgroup$
    – user149426
    Dec 3, 2019 at 12:16
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yes, that is the usual definition, but not everyone would be familiar with it (especially with $\pi$ in place of $p$), and it might have been better include in the body of the question. $\endgroup$ Dec 3, 2019 at 12:46
  • $\begingroup$ I found your quotation in a paper of Hartley, but he was assuming that the groups were locally finite, in which case 2 follows immediately from 1. I haven't found a reference for 1 yet, although you can easily reduce to the case of a simple group in which all proper subgroups are solvable. $\endgroup$
    – Derek Holt
    Dec 3, 2019 at 13:24

1 Answer 1

7
$\begingroup$

I think Question 1 reduces easily to the genuinely well known result of Philip Hall, that if the finite group $G$ has a $p$-complement for all prime divisors $p$ of $|G|$, then $G$ is solvable.

(Recall that a $p$-complement is a subgroup of order $t$, where $|G|=p^kt$ and $p$ does not divide $t$.)

To see that, let $\pi$ be the set of prime divisors of $|G|$, and let $p \in \pi$.

Now let $\pi' =\pi \setminus \{p\}$, and let $Q \in {\rm Syl}_q(G)$ with $q \in \pi'$. Then $Q$ is a $\pi'$-group, so $Q$ is contained in some Sylow $\pi'$-subgroup $R$ of $G$. This applies to all $q \in \pi'$, and by hypothesis all Sylow $\pi'$-subgroups are conjugate. So $|R|$ contains a Sylow $q$-subgroup of $G$ for all $q \in \pi'$, and hence $R$ is a $p$-complement in $G$. Now we can apply Hall's theorem to deduce solvability of $G$.

As I said in my comment, I think Hartley was assuming that the groups in question are locally finite, in which case 2 follows immediately from 1. (In any case without some extra assumption, a Tarski Monster would be a counterexample to 2.)

$\endgroup$
0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.