1
$\begingroup$

Are there any known inequalities of the following type for $f$ satisfying some conditions:

$$ \|f\|_{H_p(\mathbb{R})} \le C\|f\|_{L_p(\mathbb{R})}, $$

where $H_p$ denotes the real Hardy space and $p\le 1$ (otherwise the question would be trivial)?

Here is an example:

If $f$ is bandlimited, then

$$ \|f\|_{H_p(\mathbb{R})} \sim \|f\|_{L_p(\mathbb{R})}. $$

Does a similar conclusion also hold if $f$ is sufficiently smooth?

Of particular interest to me is the following case:

Assume that $\varphi$ satisfies the inequality above. Is the same true for any function in the integer-shift-invariant space spanned by the integer shifts of $\varphi$?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Are you talking about real or complex Hardy spaces? For complex Hardy spaces the $H^p$ norm is just (a multiple of) the $L^p$ norm of the boundary function, so the inequality is in fact an equality. For real Hardy spaces, it's a totally different question, but I'm not familiar with them. $\endgroup$ – Zen Harper Aug 4 '10 at 19:26
  • $\begingroup$ It might be worth adding that the $H^p$ notation can mean real Hardy spaces, complex Hardy spaces, or Sobolev spaces, and they're different things, so a bit more explanation might be good. $\endgroup$ – Zen Harper Aug 4 '10 at 19:29
  • $\begingroup$ I have edited the original question to address your comments. Thanks. $\endgroup$ – Philipp Aug 4 '10 at 19:38
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ If we are talking about the same spaces, a characterization of the $H_1$ norm is $$\|f\|_{H_1} = \|f \|_{L^1}+\sum\|R_j f\|_{L^1} $$ where $R_j$ are the Riesz operators with symbol $\xi_j/|\xi|$. So when $p=1$ the Hardy norm is strictly stronger. $\endgroup$ – Piero D'Ancona Sep 12 '10 at 10:26
  • $\begingroup$ I am talking about the real Hardy spaces which are defined e.g. by a Littlewood-Paley type decomposition. I am interested on results which rely on smoothness conditions on $f$. Of course, Hardy - and Lebesgue spaces are different for generic $f$. But if e.g. $f$ has bounded spectrum then the Hardy norm becomes comparable to the $L_p$ norm. I am asking to which extent this can be generalized by imposing smoothness conditions on $f$. $\endgroup$ – Philipp Sep 12 '10 at 10:53
2
$\begingroup$

Smoothness doesn't help much. Take any compactly supported smooth bump and put a few shifts of this bump far away to kill the first few moments. Then you get and $H^p$ function but the maximal operator will have a long stretch of $1/x$, which will give you a huge $H^p$ norm.

Your last question, as posed, also has negative answer: take this first example and add an $H^p$ function $f$ that satisfies the inequality and such that its norm is large but the norm of $f(x)-f(x+m)$ is small and $m$ is large (a stretch of a smooth atom renormalized properly would fit). Then the sum will satisfy the inequality because its norm sees only the good part but its difference with the shift by $m$ won't because its norm sees only the bad part.

What are you really after?

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Hi Fedja, first let me thank you for your nice answer(s). As far as I see it, your example could also be made to work with a bandlimited bump function. The larger the support of the spectrum, the larger the $H_p$ norm can get in comparison to the $L_p$ norm. What if I impose that \begin{equation}\label{1} |\hat f(\xi)| \leq (1+|\xi|)^{-N} \end{equation} for some very large $N$. This is somewhat similar to requiring that $\mbox{supp }\hat f \subset [-1,1]$ where the desired inequality holds by some classical results. Could such an inequality hold over all $f$ with (\ref{1})? $\endgroup$ – Philipp Sep 12 '10 at 15:37
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The bump example exploits the bad behavior of $\widehat f$ at $0$, not at $\infty$. You seem to forget that the Paley-Littlewood decomposition has infinitely many terms with extra-short supports of the FT, not just with extra-long ones. Your words "band limited" should really mean "with spectrum bounded away from both $0$ and $\infty$". $\endgroup$ – fedja Sep 12 '10 at 16:42
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks again and sorry for my misunderstanding. So how about if we require that $$ |\hat f(\xi)| \leq \min(1,|\xi\|^N)(1 + |\xi|)^{-N} ? $$ My essential question is: Do we really need the compact support in the frequency domain or can we replace it with decay conditions? $\endgroup$ – Philipp Sep 12 '10 at 16:54
  • $\begingroup$ The inequality is invariant under multiplication by constants and your decay conditions aren't, so there is a clear problem there. $\endgroup$ – fedja Sep 12 '10 at 17:07
  • $\begingroup$ Let us replace $\le$ by $\lesssim$. $\endgroup$ – Philipp Sep 12 '10 at 17:10

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.