2
$\begingroup$

Let $Y$ be a nonsingular subvariety of a normal, Cohen-Macaulay variety $X$. Further, let $\pi:X'\to X$ be the blowup of $X$ along $Y$.

Question: Is there a formula for the Picard group of $X'$ involving the Picard group of $X$ and the exceptional locus of the blowup?

For example when $X$ is smooth it is well known that $\textbf{Pic}\, X'\cong \textbf{Pic}\, X \oplus \mathbb{Z}$ and the isomorphism is induced by the pullback $\pi ^*: \textbf{Pic}\, X \to \textbf{Pic}\, X' $ and the class of the exceptional divisor.

$\endgroup$
6
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ A major problem to do this is that the exceptional locus maybe reducible and the irreducible components may not be Cartier divisor. Or some are and some are not. $\mathrm{Pic} X'$ will be generated by $\mathrm{Pic} X$ and the collection of Cartier divisors supported on the exceptional locus, but this will likely not be free in general (in other words, you should not expect a direct sum here always). $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 5, 2019 at 0:55
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Your assumptions of $X$ being CM and $Y$ being non-singular are not really the best for this purpose. What you need to know is how $Y$ is embedded in $X$. For instance, $Y$ could be singular, but if it is a local complete intersection, then you have much better control. In fact, if $Y$ is also irreducible, then you can expect a formula similar to the smooth case. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 5, 2019 at 0:58
  • $\begingroup$ If $Y$ is a locally-complete intersection in $X$, then the usual formulas for Chow groups of the blow up will take place, with the same proof as in the smooth case. The point is that there is a well-defined pull-back from $X$ to $Y$ and from $X$ to $X'$ in this case. This applies in particular to the Picard group. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 5, 2019 at 21:43
  • $\begingroup$ To elaborate on Sandor's comment on the non-lci case: if $X$ is a nodal threefold, and $Y = Sing(X)$, then the blow up $X'$ is the resolution of singularities of $X$, and the exact relation between $Pic(X)$ and $Pic(X')$ depends on the positions of the nodes (this phenomenon goes under the name of a defect of a nodal threefold), so there will be no simple formula in general. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 5, 2019 at 21:53
  • $\begingroup$ The answer here gives an interesting example : mathoverflow.net/questions/164214/… $\endgroup$
    – Watson
    Commented Sep 23, 2020 at 15:51

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.