Consider two functions $f: \mathcal{X} \to \mathcal{Y}$ and $g: \mathcal{X} \to \mathcal{X}$. In general, I am interested in the case where these functions have a random element, but to keep things simple we can assume they are deterministic. The statement that I am interested in proving or disproving is the following:
$I[X; f(X)] > I[X; f(g(X))]$
Note that this is different from the common statement of the data processing inequality, which would be:
$I[X; g(X)] > I[X; f(g(X))]$
Here $I$ is the mutual information and $X$ is a random variable with support in $\mathcal{X}$.
I have been unable to find a counter example to this statement, though I have tried both construction and numerical simulations (for the case of discrete random variables). My intuition says it should be true, but I have been unable to prove it thus far. My thinking is something along the lines of the data processing inequality, where additional steps of processing can only remove information from the system.
So my questions are the following:
Is the above statement true?
If it is not always true, it seems to be true in many cases. Are there any simple conditions that would imply it is true?
For cases that it is true, does the statement generalize to non-deterministic versions of $f, g$?