6
$\begingroup$

When do the orbits of an action on an algebraic variety make a Whitney stratification?

$\endgroup$
2
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Possible duplicate of Whitney stratification of affine GIT quotients $\endgroup$ Sep 26, 2019 at 20:37
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Always, if there are finitely many orbits. One can think of the Whitney conditions as positing some checkable "equi-singularity along the strata". The orbits of a group action are equi-singular in the strongest possible sense. Can't think of a ref right now but I can't imagine this is difficult to do by hand. $\endgroup$ Sep 27, 2019 at 5:40

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

The answer is indeed always when there are fnitely many orbits. Let $Y \subset X$ be an orbit, $y \in Y$, and $U \subset X$ a $G$-invariant open such that $y \in Y \cap U$, the relative open $Y \cap U$ is dense in $Y$, closed in $U$ and $U$ embedds $G$-equivariantly in some $\mathbb{C}^N$. Let us denote by: $$ C(X) = \overline{\{(x,H) \in U_{smooth} \times (\mathbb{C}^N)^*, \ \textrm{such that} \ T_{X,x} \subset H \}},$$ where the overline is the Zariski closure in $\mathbb{C}^N \times (\mathbb{C}^N)^*$. The variety $C(X)$ is known as the conormal space and is also $G$-invariant. Note that the projection map : $\pi : C(X) \longrightarrow X$ is $G$-equivariant. Let: $$ \rho : \mathrm{Bl}_{\pi^{-1}(Y)}C(X) \longrightarrow C(X)$$ be the blow-up of $C(X)$ along $\pi^{-1}(Y)$. The map $\rho$ is again $G$-equivariant, so that the composite: $$ \pi \circ \rho : \mathrm{Bl}_{\pi^{-1}(Y)}C(X) \longrightarrow C(X)$$ is $G$-equivariant. In particular, all fibers of $\pi \circ \rho$ are isomorphic and we find : $$ \dim (\pi \circ \rho)^{-1}(y) = \dim (\pi \circ \rho)^{-1}(Y) - \dim Y = N-2 - \dim Y.$$ Hence, proposition 2.3.1 in the paper Variétés Polaires II by Bernard Teissier shows that the pair $(X,Y)$ staisfies the Whitney conditions at $y$. This is true for all $y \in Y$, so that the pair $(X,Y)$ satisfies the Whitney conditions.

As hinted in the comments, if there are finitely many orbits, then you get a finite stratification of $X$ by orbits, and by the above arguments, this is a Whitney stratification.

Note however that it is certainly not the minimal stratification, as illustrated by the case $X$ smooth and $G$ acts non-trivially with finitely many orbits.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.