Given a zero-dimensional ideal $(f_1,...,f_n)$, is the ideal $(f_1-\alpha_1,...,f_n-\alpha_n)$ also zero-dimensional? Suppose you have a zero-dimensional ideal $I=(f_1,...,f_n)$ in a polynomial ring $R=k[x_1,...,x_n]$ over a field $k$, so that $\dim_k(R/I)<\infty$. Take indeterminates $\alpha_1,...,\alpha_n$ and consider the ideal $J=(f_1-\alpha_1,...,f_n-\alpha_n)$ of the ring $S=K[x_1,...,x_n]$ over the field $K=k(\alpha_1,...,\alpha_n)$. Is it true that $J$ is also a zero-dimensional ideal?
I'm especially interested in the relationship between $\dim_K(S/J)$ and $\dim_k(R/I)$. In all the examples that I tried (with my very limited Macaulay2 abilities), I found that $\dim_K(S/J)=\dim_k(R/I)$.
My thought is to compute (reduced) Gröbner bases $G_I$ for $I$ and $G_J$ for $J$, and then to compare the leading monomials that show up in $G_I$ and $G_J$. Since $I$ is zero-dimensional, there are finitely many standard monomials of $G_I$, and my hope is that the standard monomials of $G_J$ are a subset of these.
If it helps, you may assume that $k$ is algebraically closed of characteristic 0 and each $\alpha_i$ is of the form $\alpha_i=f_i(z_1,...,z_n)$ for indeterminates $z_1,...,z_n$.
Edit: If you assume that $f=(f_1,...,f_n):\mathbb{A}^n_k\to\mathbb{A}^n_k$ is quasi-finite, then $R/I$ has Krull dimension zero and hence $I$ is zero-dimensional. Since quasi-finiteness is stable under base change and composition, one can show that $J$ is a zero-dimensional ideal of $S$. However, this doesn't seem to tell us anything about the relationship between $\dim_K(S/J)$ and $\dim_k(R/I)$. 
One idea is to note that $\dim_K(S/IS)\leq\dim_k(R/I)$ and try to compare $\dim_K(S/IS)$ and $\dim_K(S/J)$.
 A: If $f$ is not generically finite-to-one then there are easy counterexamples (e.g. take $f_1 = x_1$, $f_2 = x_1 - 1 \in k[x_1, x_2]$). So assume $f$ is generically finite-to-one. 
 Claim 1:  If $f$ is generically finite-to-one and $\dim_k(R/I) < \infty$, then $\dim_k(R/I) \leq \dim_K(S/J) < \infty$. 
 Claim 2:  It is possible in the situation of Claim 1 that $\dim_k(R/I) <\dim_K(S/J)$. 
For the first claim note that $\dim_k(R/I)$ is the number (counted with multiplicity) of points in $f^{-1}(0)$ whereas $\dim_K(S/J)$ is the number (counted with multiplicity) of points in a generic fiber of $f$. For the second claim you can take any $f: k^n \to k^n$ such that $f$ is generically finite-to-one, $f^{-1}(0)$ is finite, but $|f^{-1}(0)| < \deg(f)$ (where $\deg(f)$ is the cardinality of a generic fiber of $f$). For an explicit example, take $f_1 = x_1x_2 - 1$, $f_2 = x_2(x_1x_2 - 1) + x_1$. Then $\dim_k(R/I) = 0$, whereas $\dim_K(S/J) = 2$. (I knew of this map from a paper of Zbigniew Jelonek - it is one of the simplest maps from $k^2 \to k^2$ which is quasi-finite but non-surjective.) 
