Let $(X,d)$ be Gromov-hyperbolic space and let $\Gamma$ be a finitely generated group acting on $\Gamma$ by isometries. Recall the following two definitions.

- Say that the action is acylindrical if for every $\epsilon$, there exist $R,N$ such that for every two points $x,y\in X$ with $d(x,y)\geq R$, there are at most $N$ elements $g\in \Gamma$ such that both $d(x,g\cdot x)\leq \epsilon$ and $d(y,g\cdot y)\leq \epsilon$.
- Let $h\in \Gamma$ be a loxodromic element with respect to the action. Say that $h$ is WPD if for every $\epsilon$ and every $x\in X$, there exists $m\in \mathbb{N}$ such that the set of elements $g\in \Gamma$ satisfying both $d(x,g\cdot x)\leq \epsilon$ and $d(h^m\cdot x,gh^m\cdot x)\leq \epsilon$ is finite.

Of course if the action is acylindrical, every loxodromic element is WPD. One of the main result of Osin's paper Acylindrically hyperbolic groups is that if $\Gamma$ is not virtually cyclic and acts on a hyperbolic space $X$ with a WPD element, then it acts acylindrically on a hyperbolic space $Y$.

We thus have two boundaries for $\Gamma$, namely its limit set $\Lambda_X\Gamma$ in the Gromov boundary of $X$ and its limit set $\Lambda_Y\Gamma$ in the Gromov boundary of $Y$. My question is as follows.

**Question.** Can we construct the space $Y$ such that $\Lambda_X\Gamma$ and $\Lambda_Y\Gamma$ equivariantly homeomorphic ? At least can we construct the space $Y$ such that there is an equivariant embedding $\Lambda_Y\Gamma\hookrightarrow \Lambda_X\Gamma$ ? For example, does Osin's construction of $Y$ yield an embedding $\Lambda_Y\Gamma\hookrightarrow \Lambda_X\Gamma$ ?

**Some motivation.** On the one hand, usually, when $\Gamma$ acts on a space $X$ with WPD elements, one has a geometric interpretation of $\Lambda_X\Gamma$. This is for example the case for the group $Out(F_n)$ acting on the free factor complex or on the sphere complex. On the other hand, when one has an acylindrical action, one can derive a lot of properties from this action.

One thing I'm interested in is the following. Given a random walk on $\Gamma$, the set $\Lambda_Y\Gamma$ endowed with the harmonic measure is a model for the Poisson boundary.

Thus, if $\Gamma$ acts on $X$ with a WPD element and if $\Lambda_Y\Gamma\hookrightarrow \Lambda_X\Gamma$ (or even better $\Lambda_Y\Gamma\simeq \Lambda_X\Gamma$) then one has a nice geometric interpretation of the Poisson boundary.

Basically, the proof of Osin's theorem goes as follows. Recall that a subgroup $H$ of $\Gamma$ is hyperbolically embedded in $\Gamma$ (with respect to a subset $S$ of $\Gamma$) if

- the group $\Gamma$ is generated by $S$ and $H$ and the Cayley graph $\mathrm{Cay}(\Gamma, S\cup H)$ is hyperbolic,
- the subgroup $H$, endowed with the induced metric $d_H$ is a proper metric space. This induced metric $d_H(h_1,h_2)$ is basically given by the smallest possible length of a path from $h_1$ to $h_2$ staying outside of $H$.

Now, assume that $\Gamma$ acts on $X$ with a WPD element. First, if $h$ is WPD, then it is contained in a maximal virtually cyclic subgroup $E(h)$ and $E(h)$ hyperbolically embeds into $\Gamma$. Second, if $H$ is hyperbolically embedded into $\Gamma$ with respect to a set $S$, define a set $S'$ consisting of all elements $g$ such that a geodesic from 1 to $g$ does not stay longer than $D$ inside $H$, for some fixed constant $D$. Then, the Cayley graph $\mathrm{Cay}(\Gamma,S'\cup H)$ is hyperbolic and the action of $\Gamma$ on this Cayley graph is acylindrical.

**Let us look at an easy example now.** Consider the free group $\Gamma=F_2$ and let $X$ be its Cayley graph with respect to the standard system of generators. Denote by $a$ and $b$ these two generators. Then, $a$ is WPD and one can take $E(a)=\langle a\rangle$. Clearly, $\langle a \rangle$ hyperbolically embeds into $\Gamma$ with respect to the set $S=\{b\}$.

Now, Osin's construction yields $S'=\langle b\rangle$. Thus, the space $Y$ on which $\Gamma$ acylindrically acts is $\mathrm{Cay}(\Gamma,\langle a\rangle \cup \langle b\rangle)$. This Cayley graph $\mathrm{Cay}(\Gamma,\langle a\rangle \cup \langle b\rangle)$ is quasi-isometric to the coned-off graph of $\Gamma$, considered as hyperbolic relative to its free factors. Its Gromov boundary is the set of conical limit points and it embeds into the Gromov boundary of $\Gamma$. Precisely, the boundary of $\mathrm{Cay}(\Gamma,\langle a\rangle \cup \langle b\rangle)$ is the set of infinite words alternating elements of $\langle a \rangle$ and elements of $\langle b \rangle$.

In particular, in this example, we indeed have $\Lambda_Y\Gamma\hookrightarrow\Lambda_X\Gamma$. Note however that one could take $Y$ to be the standard Cayley graph of $\Gamma$ and then one would get $\Lambda_Y\Gamma\simeq\Lambda_X\Gamma$.