I've been reading the book 'Cohomology of Number Fields' for years. But I couldn't check the commutativity of the diagram

enter image description here

on page 126 until now. So I ask for help.

The diagram is induced by taking cup-product with $t$ on a double complex, so there must be some commutative diagram, since $tr$ is also an edge morphism.

More explicitly, the edge morphism is defined as following

$Z^{p,0}_{2}/(B^{p,0}_{1}+Z^{p+1,-1}_{1}) \rightarrow Z^{p,0}_{2}/(B^{p,0}_{m-1}+Z^{p+1,-1}_{1}) \simeq Z^{p,0}_{m}/(B^{p,0}_{m-1}+Z^{p+1,-1}_{m-1})=E^{p,0}_{m}$ for sufficiently large $m$.

In this view, the lower arrow is induced by $C^{n-j}(G/U, H^{0}(U, \tilde{X}^{n}(G,A)^{\ast}) \rightarrow C^{n}(G/U, H^{0}(U, \tilde{X}^{n}(G,\mathbb{Z})^{\ast})$.

And when we define the edge morphism, we are using the Lemma 2.2.4, hence the $E^{p}$ is represented by elements of $C^{0}(G/U, H^{0}(U, \tilde{X}^{j}(G,A)^{*})$ i.e. (0,p)-component.

Eventually I could see that the lower arrow can be induced by $C^{0}(G/U, H^{0}(U, \tilde{X}^{j}(G,A)^{\ast}) \rightarrow C^{j}(G/U, H^{0}(U, \tilde{X}^{j}(G,\mathbb{Z})^{\ast})$

But I couldn't send the element of $C^{j}(G/U, H^{0}(U, \tilde{X}^{j}(G,\mathbb{Z})^{\ast})$ to the (0,n) component. The image of $tr$ is represented by (0,n)-component.

So I ask for any kind of help.

And I want to ask how I can understand the dualizing modules, Tate spectral sequence intuitively. Any kind of references are welcome.

Thank you.



Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.