6
$\begingroup$

While mimicking the union bound in quantum systems, we land on the following conjecture but don't know how to prove this. Given any complex-valued $n\times m$ matrix $A$. A sub-matrix of $A$ is defined by two index subsets $I \subseteq [n], J \subseteq [m]$, $$ (A\vert_{I, J})_{i j} := \begin{cases} A_{ij} \quad\text{ if }i\in I, j\in J \\ 0 \quad \text{ otherwise. } \end{cases} $$ Now there are $k$ index sets pairs $I_t\subset [n], J_t\subset [m]$ for $1\le t\le k$. Suppose that for any $i\in [n], j\in [m]$, there always exists some $t$ such that $i\in I_t, j\in J_t$. (Notice that $t$ might not be unique.)

Does the following inequality always hold? $$ \|A\|_{\mathrm{op}} \le \sum_{1\le t\le k}\big\|A\vert_{I_t, J_t}\big\|_{\mathrm{op}} $$ where $\|\cdot\|_{\mathrm{op}}$ is the operator 2-norm, or equivalently, the maximum singular value.


(We posted the question in Math Stackexchange, but then realized that this should be a research level question. Thus we have deleted the old post and re-post here.)

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

Assume we work with the operator 2-norm. We have $$\|A\|_2^2 = \sup_{\|x\|=1} \|Ax\|_2^2=\sup_{\|x\|=1} \sum_{j=1}^{m}(\sum_{i=1}^{n}a_{ji}x_i)^2.$$ Let $I_t=\{i^t_{1}, \dots i^t_{p(t)}\}$ and $J_t=\{j^t_{1}, \dots j^t_{r(t)}\}$. Hence \begin{equation} \sum_{1 \leq t \leq k} \|A_{I_t,J_t}\|_2^2=\sum_{1 \leq t \leq k}\ \sup_{\|x\|=1}\|A_{I_t,J_t}x\|^2_2= \sup_{\|x\|=1}\ \sum_{1 \leq t \leq k} \sum_{k=1}^{r(t)} (\sum_{l=1}^{p(t)}a_{j^t_k i^t_l}x_i)^2. \end{equation} Now since for any $i \in [n],\ j \in [m]$ there is a $t$ such that $i \in I_t,\ j \in J_t$, the triple sum must contain all terms $(a_{ji}x_i)$ for $i \in [n],\ j \in [m]$ at least once. There could be some extra terms, which are non negative, so we have $$\|A\|_2^2 \leq \sum_{1 \leq t \leq k} \|A_{I_t,J_t}\|_2^2 \leq \bigg({\sum_{1 \leq t \leq k} \|A_{I_t,J_t}\|_2 }\bigg)^2.$$ Now $\sqrt{\cdot}$ is monotone, thus by taking the square root we get the desired inequality.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ The first equation is in general wrong since it should be $$ \sup_{\Vert x\Vert=1}\sum_{j=1}^m\left|\sum_{i=1}^na_{ji}x_i\right|^2 $$ $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 22, 2019 at 11:22
  • $\begingroup$ You are right, but as far as I see the same argument still holds. $\endgroup$
    – dioniz
    Commented Aug 22, 2019 at 11:33
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ No, the argument does not hold. even if the triple sum contains all terms $(A_{ji}x_i)$, it does the square of not necessarily be greater. Since extra terms might cancel out with original terms. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 22, 2019 at 13:32

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .