Given a cosimplicial commutative algebra $A^\bullet$ over a field of characteristic zero, there are two ways of producing an $A_\infty$-structure on its realization $|A^\bullet| := \int^\Delta C^*(\Delta^\bullet)\otimes A^\bullet$, where $C^*(-)$ is the simplicial cochain complex, i.e. $|A^\bullet|$ is the cochain complex with $|A^\bullet|^n = A^n$ and differential the alternating sum of coface maps:

  • The Alexander-Whitney map endows the realization functor with a lax monoidal structure, so that it sends the monoid $A^\bullet$ in cosimplicial groups to a monoid in cochain complexes, i.e. a differential graded algebra. Explicitly, the product of $a_p\in A^p$ and $a_q\in A^q$ is (up to sign) $f_{p,q}(a_p)b_{p,q}(a_q)$, where $f_{p,q}: A^p\to A^{p+q}$ and $b_{p,q}:A^q\to A^{p+q}$ are the "front and back" cofaces. Note that this does not use the commutativity of $A^\bullet$, and the product is not commutative in general. Call this (dga, and thus in particular) $A_\infty$-algebra $|A^\bullet|_{CG}$.
  • The coend $\Omega^*(A^\bullet):=\int^\Delta \Omega_P^*(\Delta^\bullet)\otimes A^\bullet$, where $\Omega^*_P(\Delta^n) = k[t_0,\dots,t_n,\mathrm dt_0,\dots,\mathrm dt_n]/(t_0+\dots+t_n-1,\mathrm dt_0 + \dots + \mathrm dt_n)$ carries a natural (commutative) dga structure. As explained by Cheng and Getzler, there is a simplicial retraction $\Omega_P^*(\Delta^\bullet) \rightleftarrows C^*(\Delta^\bullet)$, giving rise to a retraction $\Omega^*(A^\bullet)\rightleftarrows|A^\bullet|$ along which this structure can be transfered to an $A_\infty$-structure on $|A_\bullet|$ (actually, even a $C_\infty$-structure). The operations are given by sums over trees. Call this $A_\infty$-algebra $|A^\bullet|_{CG}$.

Obviously these two structures are quite different: For instance, the $2$-ary operation of the first is associative, but not commutative, whereas that of the second is commutative, but not associate.

There is a special case where I know that these $A_\infty$ algebras are equivalent: If $M$ is a smooth manifold and $A^\bullet = \operatorname{Sing}^\bullet(M)$ is the cosimplicial commutative algebra of functions on smooth simplices, there is a zigzag $$ |A^\bullet|_{CG}\rightarrow \Omega^*(A^\bullet)\rightarrow \int^\Delta \Omega^*(\Delta^\bullet)\otimes A^\bullet \leftarrow \Omega^*(M)\rightarrow |A^\bullet|_{AW} $$ where the maps are, in order:

  • the canonical $A_\infty$-morphism produced by the homotopy transfer
  • the (simplex-wise) inclusion of polynomial forms into smooth forms
  • the map $\omega\mapsto (\sigma\mapsto \sigma^*\omega)$
  • an explicit $A_\infty$-isomorphism obtained by Chen's iterated integrals, see for instance here.

Is there a natural $A_\infty$-isomorphism between $|A^\bullet|_{AW}$ and $|A^\bullet|_{CG}$? Can it be made reasonably explicit? If there is, does it extend the above construction for $A^\bullet = \operatorname{Sing}^\bullet(M)$, or is there at least a natural (and explicit?) $A_\infty$-homotopy between them?


1 Answer 1


$\DeclareMathOperator{\Sing}{Sing}$It turns out that the answer is yes, essentially for formal reasons; in case someone finds this question, let me sketch the argument.

Taking $X = \Delta^n = \{(t_0,\dots,t_n)\in \mathbb R^{n+1}\mid \sum_i t_i = 1\}$ the algebraic $n$-simplex, there are algebra maps $\Omega_{P}^*(\Delta^n)\to \Omega^*(X)$ and $\Sing^*(X)\to C^*(\Delta^n)$, and we obtain a pair of composable $A_\infty$-morphisms $(C^*(\Delta^n))_{CG}\rightsquigarrow \Omega^*(\Delta^n)\rightsquigarrow (C^*(\Delta^n))_{AW}$. The iterated integral $A_\infty$-morphism $\Omega^*(X)\rightsquigarrow \Sing^*(X)$ is (strictly) functorial with respect to smooth maps $X\to Y$; this means that the above construction defines a simplicial object in the category of triples of $A_\infty$-algebras together with a pair of composable $A_\infty$-morphisms, where morphisms are strict morphisms of $A_\infty$-algebras. Call this category $\operatorname{Alg}_\infty^{[2]}$. Note that the underlying morphism of chain complexes from $(C^*(\Delta^\bullet))_{CG}$ to $(C^*(\Delta^\bullet))_{AW}$ is the identity.

Given a cosimplicial commutative algebra $A^\bullet$, we can tensor this diagram with $A^\bullet$ to get a functor $\Delta\times\Delta^{op}\to \operatorname{Alg}_\infty^{[2]}$, whose end defines an object in $\operatorname{Alg}_\infty^{[2]}$. Since $\operatorname{Alg}_\infty^{[2]}$ is the category of algebras over a colored operad, limits (and hence also ends) are calculated on underlying objects; this object is therefore given by $|A^\bullet|_{CG}\rightsquigarrow \int^{\Delta}A^\bullet\otimes \Omega_P^*(\Delta^\bullet)\rightsquigarrow |A^\bullet|_{AW}$, and the underlying chain map of the composition is the identity.

For $A^\bullet = \Sing^\bullet(X)$, the resulting morphism is the iterated integral map; this again follows from its strict functoriality with respect to smooth maps.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.