1
$\begingroup$

Consider a finite-dimensional geodesically complete CAT(0) cube complex $X$.

A hyperplane of $X$ is a convex subspace of $X$ that intersects the mid-point of edges of $X$ such that $X - H$ has two components.

A hyperbolic isometry $\gamma$ of $X$ is parallel to a hyperplane $\hat{\mathfrak{h}}$ if there exists an axis for $\gamma$ which is contained in a neighbourhood of $\hat{\mathfrak{h}}$.

Is every hyperbolic isometry of a geodesically complete finite dimensional CAT(0)-cube complex parallel to a hyperplane?

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The answer is negative even for simplicial trees. $\endgroup$ – AGenevois Aug 1 '19 at 13:04
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Please avoid creating a new account each time you're asking another question (cf mathoverflow.net/questions/337469/…) $\endgroup$ – YCor Aug 3 '19 at 10:53
3
$\begingroup$

As pointed out in the comments, the answer is negative. But we can prove even more:

Proposition: Let $G$ be a group acting properly and cocompactly on a CAT(0) cube complex $X$. Then there exist a $G$-invariant convex subcomplex $Y \subset X$ and an isometry $g \in G$ which not parallel to any of the hyperplanes of $Y$.

In other words, the question has a negative answer in most of the reasonnable situations.

Sketch of proof. Let $Y \subset X$ be a convex subcomplex on which $G$ acts essentially [CS, Proposition 3.5]. Decompose $Y$ as a Cartesian product $Y_1 \times \cdots \times Y_n$ of irreducible cube complexes and fix a finite-index subgroup $\dot{G} \leq G$ which preserves the product structure. Now look at the induced (cocompact) action $\dot{G} \curvearrowright Y_i$. As a consequence of [CS, Theorem 6.3], $\dot{G}$ contains a strongly contracting isometry of $Y_i$ (i.e., an isometry which skewers a pair of strongly separated hyperplanes).

Thus, $\dot{G}$ acts simultaneously on $n$ hyperbolic graphs, namely the contact graphs of $Y_1, \ldots, Y_n$, and $\dot{G}$ contains a loxodromic isometry for each action. By applying [CU], it follows that $\dot{G}$ contains an element inducing a loxodromic isometry simultaneously in all the contact graphs. Such an element, thought of as an isometry of $Y$, cannot be parallel to any hyperplane. $\square$

[CS] P.-E. Caprace and M. Sageev, Rank rigidity for CAT(0) cube complexes.

[CU] M. Clay and C. Uyanik, Simultaneous construction of hyperbolic isometries.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.