exotic smooth structure clarification Does the existence of exotic smooth structure in $\mathbb{R}^4$ imply the existence of an atlas which has a $C^0$ mapping to the Cartesian atlas, but not a $C^k$ mapping (for some finite $k$)?  Does the nonexistence of exotic smooth structure in $\mathbb{R}^n$, $n\neq 4$ imply that all atlases therein have smooth mappings to the Cartesian atlas?  
 A: Regarding your 1st question, perhaps you meant to ask something else?  Any atlas can be composed with a non-smooth homeomorphism to produce an atlas that isn't smooth in the standard sense. For example, $\mathbb R \to \mathbb R$ defined by $t \longmapsto t^{1/3}$ is an atlas on $\mathbb R$ but it's not $C^1$. This answers your 2nd question in the negative. 
Alternatively, some exotic smooth $\mathbb R^4$'s are diffeomorphic to open subsets of the standard $\mathbb R^4$, so even for exotic smooth $\mathbb R^4$'s you could potentially have only a one-map atlas, which is smooth in the standard sense.  
You might like to read this article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exotic_R4
A: What do you mean by "smooth mapping" of atlases? I think you maybe using the terminology a bit different from how I do. 
A chart or a coordinate chart on a topological manifold $M$ is a pair $(U,\psi)$ where $U\subset M$ is open and $\psi: U \to V\subset \mathbb{R}^n$ is a homeomorphism. Given two charts $(U_1,\psi_1)$ and $(U_2,\psi_2)$ with non-empty intersection $U_1\cap U_2$, we say that the charts are $C^k$ compatible if the transition function $\psi_2\circ\psi_1^{-1} |_{\psi_1(U_1\cap U_2)}$ is $k$-times continuously differentiable. Then a $C^k$ atlas on $M$ is a collection of charts $\{(U_\alpha,\psi_\alpha)\}_{\alpha \in A}$ such that the union $\cup_{\alpha \in A} U_\alpha$ covers $M$ and all the charts are $C^k$-compatible.
Two atlases are said to be $C^k$ compatible if all of their corresponding charts are pair-wise compatible, and hence if $\mathcal{A},\mathcal{B}$ are two compatible atlases, their union also is an atlas. An atlas is said to be maximal if any other compatible atlas must be a subset. It always exists by Zorn's lemma. 
A differential structure on the manifold $M$ is a choice of a maximal $C^
\infty$ atlas, we write it as $(M,\mathcal{A})$. Two differentiable manifolds $(M,\mathcal{A})$ and $(N,\mathcal{B})$ are said to be diffeomorphic if there exists a homeomorphism $\Psi: M\to N$ such that for any $(U_{\alpha},\psi_\alpha) \in \mathcal{A}$ and $(V_{\beta}, \phi_{\beta})\in\mathcal{B}$ we have that the function
$$ \phi_\beta \circ \Psi \circ \psi_\alpha^{-1} |_{\psi_\alpha(U_\alpha \cap \Psi^{-1}(V_\beta))} $$
is smooth. 
Ryan already gave you an answer to your question. But let me elaborate a bit on your question two. Let $\mathbb{R}^2$ be your manifold. Define two charts on it
$$ U_1 := \mathbb{R}\times (-1,\infty), U_2 := \mathbb{R}\times (-\infty,1) $$
and define $\psi_1(x) = x$ if $x\in \mathbb{R}\times (-1,2)$ and $\psi_1(x_1,x_2) = (x_1 + x_2 - 2, x_2)$ if $x_2 \geq 2$. Similarly $\psi_2$. Clearly $(U_1,\psi_1), (U_2, \psi_2)$ cover $\mathbb{R}^2$ and the transition function on the strip $\mathbb{R}\times (-1,1)$ is equal to the identity, and hence is smooth, so this gives a smooth atlas. But this smooth atlas is not compatible with the standard Cartesian atlas. What that does not mean that $\mathbb{R}^2$ with this atlas is exotic! 
Let $(\mathbb{R}^k,\mathcal{E})$ denote the standard Euclidean space. An exotic smooth structure $(\mathbb{R}^k,\mathcal{A})$ requires that every homeomorphism from $\mathbb{R}^k$ to itself to not extend to a diffeomorphism from $(\mathbb{R}^k,\mathcal{E})\to (\mathbb{R}^k,\mathcal{A})$. What we have here is just that our stupid choice of homeomorphism is non-smooth. It is simple to change our homeomorphism such that the mapping is smooth relative to the fixed atlases. 
So the non-existence of exotic smooth structure just say that for any two fixed smooth atlases, there exists some homeomorphism from $\mathbb{R}^k$ to itself such that it extends to a diffeomorphism. If this is what you meant, then the answer to your second question is "yes". But again, I don't understand what you mean by "smooth mapping of atlases". 
