5
$\begingroup$

Let $(C, \otimes, I)$ be a symmetric monoidal abelian category. For an object $M$ in $C$ with a map $\rho : M \rightarrow I$, we can form the chain complex $M_*$ where $M_n = \otimes_{i = 1}^n M$ and $d : M_n \rightarrow M_{n-1}$ is $$ \sum_{i = 1}^n (-1)^i 1 \otimes \cdots \otimes \rho \otimes \cdots \otimes 1 $$ where $\rho$ is in the $i$th slot (this is a less-than-ideal of writing the map, but I think it should be clear what I mean).

This is sort of like a Bar construction, but we got less information to start with than a typical module over a monad. My questions are

  1. What is the simplicial object over $C$ corresponding to $M_*$ under the Dold-Khan correspondence?

  2. Is there a name for this construction?

  3. Can we view this as an instance of the Bar construction?

Example: Note that, if we take $C$ to be the symmetric monoidal category of $R$-modules over a commutative ring $R$ and modify the twist map $\tau$ so that $\tau_{M} : M \otimes_R M \rightarrow M \otimes_R M$ sends $a \otimes b$ to $-b \otimes a$, then we get $\Lambda (M)$ above. If $M = R^n$ and we are given a map $\rho : R^n \rightarrow R$, then $M_*$ above is the Koszul complex. So this means that the Koszul complex is an example of the kind of resolution above.

Another one along the same vein is De Rham cohomology.

Thanks very much!

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Is $M_0 = I$? I can't think of anything else it could be. $\endgroup$
    – David Roberts
    Commented Jul 21, 2019 at 22:27
  • $\begingroup$ that's right, sorry $\endgroup$
    – user30211
    Commented Jul 21, 2019 at 22:54
  • $\begingroup$ In your example, there is no such twist map. But you can work with chain complexes with such a twist map and then regard $M$ as a chain complex concentrated in degree $0$. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 30, 2020 at 17:54

1 Answer 1

4
$\begingroup$

Have you looked at Illusie's Complexe Cotangent et Deformations I? Specifically Section 1.3, "The Theorem of Dold-Puppe" where there's a fairly formal formula for the simplicial object to which your complex corresponds. Also, Section 1.5, "The Standard Simplicial Resolution" which is Illusie's name for the Bar construction.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Hi Eric, nice to hear from you. I will look into this. $\endgroup$
    – user30211
    Commented Jul 21, 2019 at 22:57

You must log in to answer this question.