0
$\begingroup$

This question is pertaining to finite connected vertex-transitive graphs.

I recently read "Transitive permutation groups without semiregular subgroup" by Cameron, Giudici, Jones, Kantor, Klin, Marušič, Nowitz (publisher link; MSN review), where I found the concept of "elusive groups".

A permutation group $G$ acting on a set $X$ is called elusive if $G$ is transitive and contains no nontrivial semiregular subgroup (equivalently, no fixed-point-free element of prime order). I understand that transitive subgroups of elusive groups are elusive.

My question is: In light of the Polycirculant Conjecture, are the following statements is true?

Elusive groups cannot be the full automorphism group of any vertex-transitive graph.

or

Elusive groups cannot be any transitive subgroup of the full automorphism group of any vertex-transitive graph.

P.S. I am trying to understand how an elusive Group is a hindrance towards the Polycirculant Conjecture.

(Previously posted on MathSE.)

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I have edited it, now. $\endgroup$ – user52949 Jul 14 '19 at 14:10
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ If $G$ is transitive and elusive, it can just be viewed as transitive subgroup of the automorphism group of the complete graph (on the given set). So if I understand correctly, the second question has a negative answer. $\endgroup$ – YCor Jul 14 '19 at 14:37
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Please wait more than a few hours before crossposting. $\endgroup$ – verret Jul 14 '19 at 21:01
3
$\begingroup$

Any elusive group of degree $n$ is a subgroup of the full automorphism group of the complete graph $K_n$, so your second statement is not true.

The Polycirculant Conjecture asserts that the full automorphism group of a digraph contains a derangement of prime order, i.e, is not elusive.

But while there are various families of elusive groups known, none of these groups are the full automorphism group of a digraph.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for your explanation. But does that mean we can not have a GRR on an Elusive group, say $M_{11}$? $\endgroup$ – user52949 Jul 14 '19 at 17:02
  • $\begingroup$ No, it does not, I've already explained this to you (in a private communication). You are conflating abstract groups and permutation groups. Saying "$M_{11}$ is elusive" without specifying an action is meaningless. $M_{11}$ is only elusive in one particular action of degree $12$. All its other actions are non-elusive, including its regular one. $\endgroup$ – verret Jul 14 '19 at 21:04

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.