0
$\begingroup$

Note: This is very similar to this question of mine on Math.Se, which hasn't received any answers yet.

It is known, that for any centrally symmetric convex polygon $A$ there exists a norm $\| \cdot \|$, whose unit ball is $A$, namely $\| x \| = \inf \{ t>0: \frac{x}{t} \in A\}$. But how about the other way around, given a "composite" norm $$ \| \cdot \| := \sum_{k \in \mathbb{N}} \alpha_k \| \cdot \|_k, $$ on a vector space $V$, where $\sum_{k \in \mathbb{N}} \alpha_k = 1$, such that the norm converges and the $\{i_k\}_{k \in \mathbb{N}}$ just being some index set for the norms used, what can we say about the unit ball centred at zero with respect to $\| \cdot \|$, $\mathscr{B} := \{ \omega \in V: \| \| \omega \| < 1 \}$.

It is clear that that a a polygon with a odd number of vertices can not occur because of the symmetry of the norm.

New contributor
Viktor Glombik is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering. Check out our Code of Conduct.
$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Are we talking about $\mathbb{R}^n$? Can the $\|\cdot\|_k$ be any norms? Is the notation $i_k$ used anywhere? Do you allow $\alpha_0 =1$ and all other $\alpha_k = 0$? $\endgroup$ – Nik Weaver Jul 12 at 15:12
  • $\begingroup$ We can assume $V = \mathbb{R}^n$. For the definition of the "composite norm" it shall be just a sum of arbitrary norms with coefficients chosen such that the series converges, no other restrictions apply. $\endgroup$ – Viktor Glombik Jul 13 at 12:18
  • $\begingroup$ Take $\alpha_0 =1$ and all other $\alpha_k = 0$. Then $\|\cdot\| = \|\cdot\|_0$. If $\|\cdot\|_0$ is arbitrary then so is $\|\cdot\|$. $\endgroup$ – Nik Weaver Jul 13 at 12:43

Your Answer

Viktor Glombik is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.