3
$\begingroup$

Let $X,Y$ be smooth complex varieties and let $G$ be an smooth affine algebraic group acting on $X$ and $Y$ such that $X,Y$ are $G$-homogeneous spaces (the $G$ action is transitive). We also let $f:Y \to X$ a smooth $G$-equivariant morphism.

Finally, consider $\mathcal{D}$ a sheaf of $G$-homogeneous twisted differential operators(htdo) on $X$. Since, $\mathcal{D}$ is in particular a tdo, one may define $$f^{\#} \mathcal{D}:= \text{Dif}_{f^{-1} \mathcal{D}}(f^* \mathcal{D},f^*\mathcal{D})$$

a tdo on $Y$. Is it true that $f^{\#} \mathcal{D}$ is a $G$-htdo on $Y$?

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

This is true.

One definition of htdo is analogues to that of equivariant sheaf: a htdo is a tdo $\mathcal D$ equipped with an isomorphism $act^\sharp \mathcal{D} \cong pr_X^\sharp \mathcal{D}$ satisfying the cocycle condition, where $G \times X \xrightarrow{act} X$ and $G \times X \xrightarrow{pr_X} X$ are the action map and projection. Then one can prove homogeneity of $f^\sharp \mathcal{D}$ in the same way one proves the analogues statement for equivariant sheaves.


In fact, we can know more. Recall that if $X = G/K$, then htdo's on X are parameterized by the subset $I(\mathfrak{k}^\ast) \subset \mathfrak{k}^\ast$ consisting of elements vanishing on $[\mathfrak{k},\mathfrak{k}]$. Let $\mathcal{D}_{X,\lambda}$ be the htdo corresponding to $\lambda \in I(\mathfrak{k}^\ast)$.

Claim. Let $L \subset K \subset G$ be closed subgroups. Suppose $Y = G/L \xrightarrow{f} G/K = X$ is $G$-equivariant and $\lambda \in I(\mathfrak{k}^*)$, then $f^\sharp \mathcal{D}_{X,\lambda} \cong \mathcal{D}_{Y,\lambda|{\mathfrak{l}}}$.

Here's an outline of a ''down-to-earth'' proof. One constructs a chart $(V \subseteq X, \mathcal{D}_X|_V \xrightarrow{\rho} \mathcal{D}_{X,\lambda}|_V)$ and translate it to obtain an open cover of $X$ by charts. $\mathcal{D}_{X,\lambda}|_V$ is then determined by the transition functions, each of which is determined by a closed 1-form $\omega$ on the intersection. By functoriality of $f^\sharp$, the preimages of translates of $(V,\rho)$ are charts for $f^\sharp \mathcal{D}_{X,\lambda}$ whose transition functions are determined by the $f^* \omega$'s.

If the construction of $(V,\rho)$ is ''equivariant enough'', we can use the same construction to obtain charts of $\mathcal{D}_{Y,\lambda|\mathfrak{l}}$, and the 1-forms determining the transition functions will be equal to the $f^* \omega$'s. Therefore $f^\sharp \mathcal{D}_{X,\lambda}$ and $\mathcal{D}_{Y,\lambda|\mathfrak{l}}$ have the same transition functions, whence isomorphic.

For the construction of such a chart, see [M] proof of Proposition 2.3, Chapter 1.

[M] ${}$ Localization and Representation Theory of Reductive Lie Groups, Dragan Milicic.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.