1
$\begingroup$

In a lecture note, from where I am studying theory of von Neumann algebras, the author has commented that the following are equivalent. Let $A$ be a von Neumann algebra.

  1. $A$ is SOT separable.

  2. $A$ is WOT separable.

  3. $A$ is $\sigma$-WOT separable.

  4. The predual is a separable Banach space.

Clearly, 1. implies 2. But I do not know how to prove the other implications. Can someone help me to prove this in the most elementary way?

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

It doesn't look like a research level question, but I wasn't able to track down a simple statement of the (easy) equivalences (1) $\Leftrightarrow$ (2) $\Leftrightarrow$ (3) in the standard references, so I think it is worthwhile to give an answer.

Lemma. Let $X_0$ be a countable subset of a complex topological vector space $E$. Then the set of all finite linear combinations of elements of $X_0$ with complex rational (in $\mathbb{Q} + i\mathbb{Q}$) coefficients is countable and its closure is a linear subspace of $E$. (Exercise)

The equivalence of (1), (2), and (3) now follows from the fact that all three topologies have the same continuous linear functionals (a standard fact). E.g., for (2) $\Rightarrow$ (1), if $X_0$ is a countable WOT dense subset of $A$ then its complex rational span $X$ is still countable, and the SOT closure of $X$ is a SOT closed subspace such that any (WOT-continuous, hence SOT-continuous) linear functional that vanishes on it must be zero. Hence $X$ is SOT dense in $A$.

For (4) $\Rightarrow$ (3), use the fact that the unit ball of the dual of any separable Banach space is weak* compact and weak* metrizable (exercise). Thus if the predual of $A$ is separable then its unit ball is weak* (= $\sigma$-WOT) separable and hence $A$ is weak* separable.

However, (3) does not imply (4). For instance, the von Neumann algebra $l^\infty[0,1]$ is weak* separable ($C[0,1]$ is weak* dense) but its predual, $l^1[0,1]$, is not separable.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.