1
$\begingroup$

Let $(X,d)$ be a complete separable metric space, $P_1(X,d)$ be the set of Radon probability measures on $X$ satisfying $$ P_1(X,d)\triangleq \left\{ \nu:\,(\exists x_0\in X)\, \int_{x\in X} d(x,x_0)d\nu(x) <\infty \right\}, $$ which will be equipped with the 1-Wasserstein metric $d_{W_1}$.

In Section 3.1 of this text, it is remarked that the existence of a $1$-Lipschitz map $\beta:P_1(X,d)\rightarrow (X,d)$ satisfying $$ \beta(\delta_x)=x, $$ implies that $(X,d)$ is a Busemann space; hence does not exist in general.

Question: If the requirement the $\beta$ is $1$-Lipschitz is relaxed to the existence of a lsc function $\rho:(0,\infty)\rightarrow (0,\infty)$ satisfying $\lim\limits_{x \downarrow \infty} \rho(0)=0$ and $$ \rho(d_{W_1}(\beta(x),\beta(y)))\leq d(x,y), $$ then does this still imply the existence of geodesics on $(X,d)$. In particular, do such maps exist in general for some such $\rho$? For example, $\rho$ may be $$ \rho(x)\triangleq L x^{\alpha}, $$ for some $\alpha \in (0,1)$ and $K>0$.

$\endgroup$
1

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

No. It does not imply the existence of geodesics. Fix $0 < a < 1$ and consider $a$-snowflake of $[0,1]$. I.e. a metric on $[0,1]$ given by $$d(x,y) = |x-y|^a,$$ the resulting metric space is denoted by $[0,1]^a$. Note that this metric is greater then the original one and does not allow curves of finite length.

Take $\beta$ to be a standard barycenter map for measures on $\mathbb{R}$. Now for two probability measures $\mu$ and $\nu$ on $[0,1]$ we have $$d(\beta(\mu),\beta(\nu)) = |\beta(\mu) - \beta(\nu)|^a \le (d_{W_1([0,1])}(\mu,\nu))^a \le (d_{W_1([0,1]^a)}(\mu,\nu))^a.$$

$\endgroup$
0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.