Set $u_0\in H^1 (\mathbb{R} ^N)$ and $1<\alpha < \frac{N+2}{N-2}$. I want to show that there exists $\varepsilon > 0$ s.t. if $\Vert u _0 \Vert _ {H^1} < \varepsilon$, then there is global solution (defined for all $t\in\mathbb{R})$ of $$ u_t = i (\Delta u + \vert u \vert ^{\alpha -1} u) $$ $$ u(\cdot,0)=u_0 $$

I have proved the existence of solution (local). Now I want to prove that is in fact global. In order to do that, I thought to use the blow-up alternative, that is, I just have to show that $\Vert u \Vert _{H^1(\mathbb{R}^N)}$ is bounded, where $u$ is a $H^1-$solution. It is clear that $ \Vert u \Vert _{H^1(\mathbb{R}^N)} = \Vert u \Vert _{L^2(\mathbb{R}^N)} + \Vert \nabla u \Vert _{L^2\mathbb{R}^N)}$.

By the mass conservation, $\Vert u \Vert _{L^2(\mathbb{R}^N)} = \Vert u _0\Vert _{L^2(\mathbb{R}^N)} $. By the energy conservation, $ \frac{1}{2}\Vert \nabla u\Vert_{L^2} ^2 - \frac{1}{\alpha + 1} \Vert u \Vert_{L^{\alpha+1}} ^{\alpha +1} \equiv E\in\mathbb{R} $ therefore, by Sobolev embedding, $$ \Vert \nabla u\Vert_{L^2} ^2\leq 2E + \frac{2}{\alpha + 1} \Vert u \Vert_{L^{\alpha+1}} ^{\alpha +1}\leq 2E + \frac{2C}{\alpha + 1} \Vert u \Vert_{H^1} ^{\alpha +1}$$

If I show that $\Vert \nabla u\Vert_{L^2} ^2 \leq 2E + \frac{2C}{\alpha + 1} \Vert u \Vert_{H^1} ^{\alpha +1} \leq \text{constant}$ I finish. I have the assumption that $\Vert u _ 0 \Vert _{H^1}$ is small, does it implies that $\Vert u \Vert _{H^1}$ is also small? As I am reading on Internet, I found something called Lyapunov stability. Maybe is useful here, can anyone explain how could be used in this situation? Thanks in advance. Any idea is welcome!

New contributor
R. N. Marley is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering. Check out our Code of Conduct.
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yes, because the set $\{t\le \varepsilon+Ct^{1+\alpha}\}$ has a bounded connected component near $0$ for sufficiently small $\varepsilon$ and you cannot go out of it and jump to the unbounded component because $\|u\|_{H_1}$ is a continuous function of $t$. $\endgroup$ – fedja May 14 at 17:10
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry, I dont understand that. Is that related to lyapunov criteria? $\endgroup$ – R. N. Marley May 14 at 17:16
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Depends on what you mean by "Lyapunov criteria". What I'm saying is that the $H^1$-norm $S$ of your solution always satisfies the inequality $S^2\le\varepsilon+CS^{1+\alpha}$ (sorry for the missing square in the previous remark) due to the conservation laws where $\varepsilon$ (norm squared plus energy of $u_0$) is as small as you want. The set of non-negative $S$ satisfying this inequality has 2 connected components: one bounded, in which you initially are, and one unbounded. Due to the continuity of $S$, you cannot jump from the bounded component to the unbounded, so $S$ is globally bounded. $\endgroup$ – fedja May 14 at 17:28
  • $\begingroup$ By conservation laws, I have $$ \Vert \nabla u\Vert_{L^2} ^2\leq 2E + \frac{2}{\alpha + 1} \Vert u \Vert_{L^{\alpha+1}} ^{\alpha +1}\leq 2E + \frac{2C}{\alpha + 1} \Vert u \Vert_{H^1} ^{\alpha +1}$$ it seems that you are calling $S=\Vert \nabla u\Vert_{L^2}=\Vert u\Vert_{H^1}$? $\endgroup$ – R. N. Marley May 14 at 17:36
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Erm... Have you read my stupid rants about the bounded component at all? $\endgroup$ – fedja May 14 at 18:35

Your Answer

R. N. Marley is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.