7
$\begingroup$

The first problem of IMO 1986 asks the following:

Prove that, one can find two distinct $a,b$ in the set $\{2,5,13,d\}$ such that $ab-1$ is not a perfect square.

Note that, this proves, for the set $S=\{2,5,13\}$, and for any distinct $x,y\in S$, $xy-1$ is a perfect square, and that, adding any other element to $S$ violates the condition.

Now, the natural question is the following. What is the largest $n$, for which, there exists a set $\{x_1,\dots,x_n\}$ of distinct positive integers, for which, $x_ix_j -1$ is always a perfect square? Clearly, $n\geq 3$, due to the argument above.

Remark : This problem arised as a post in AoPS forums, currently having no (useful) replys.

$\endgroup$
6
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Diophantine tuples are related. $\endgroup$
    – Wojowu
    May 8, 2019 at 17:27
  • $\begingroup$ Wojovu, thank you, very interesting line of research. $\endgroup$
    – hookah
    May 8, 2019 at 17:30
  • 8
    $\begingroup$ It is apparently conjectured that there is no such set of four integers. It is known that there are at most $5\cdot 10^{60}$ such quadruples. See here $\endgroup$
    – Wojowu
    May 8, 2019 at 17:34
  • $\begingroup$ For this particular question, you don't need to solve the general case. $\endgroup$ May 8, 2019 at 21:25
  • $\begingroup$ Maybe emphasising the IMO problem is not great, because both answers given address only that question instead of your actual question. $\endgroup$ Oct 29, 2019 at 19:04

2 Answers 2

-1
$\begingroup$

In this particular case it is easy to prove that for any $d \in \Bbb N$ at least one of $\{2d-1,5d-1,13d-1\}$ is not a perfect square. Let's rephrase the problem as:

Prove that there does not exist a $4$-tuple of positive integers $\{d,x,y,z\}$ such that $$ 2d-1 = x^2\\ 5d-1 = y^2 \\ 13d-1 = z^2 $$

Proof by contradiction: Let $\{d,x,y,z\}$ be such a $4$-tuple. Then:

$x$ is odd: $2d-1 = x^2\implies \exists t \in \Bbb N : x = 2t+1$. The first equation then reduces to $$ d = 2t^2 - 2t + 1 $$ and the second equation becomes $$ 10t^2 - 10 t + 4 = y^2 \\ \implies \exists u \in \Bbb N : y = 2u $$ The second equation then reduces to $5 t^2 - 5t + 2 = 2u^2$. Considering that equation in mod $5$ we see that $u^2 = 1 \pmod{5} \implies \exists v \in \Bbb N : u = 5v \pm 1$. Here we have used the fact that the only two square roots of $1$ in mod 5 are $1$ and $4 \equiv -1$.

Letting $u = 5v \pm 1$ we have $$ 5 t^2 - 5t + 2 = 2u^2 \implies 5 t^2 - 5t + 2 = 50 v^2 \pm 20 v + 2 \\ t^2 - t = 10 v^2 \pm 4v \\ d= 2(t^2-t)+1 = 20v^2 \pm 8v + 1 $$ Substituting this $d$ into the third equation we obtain $$ 13 d - 1 = z^2 \\ 260 v^2 \pm 104 v +13 -1 = z^2 $$ So $z$ is even and writing $z=2w$ we have $$ 65v^2 \pm 26v + 3 = w^2 $$ and considering this mod $13$ we have (A) $w = 13 r -4$ or (B) $w = 13r-9$.

(A) $w = 13 r -4$ leads to $$ 5v^2\pm 2v = 13r^2-8r+1 $$ In this equation, either $v$ (and hence the LHS) is even and $r$ is odd, or $v$ is odd, both sides of the equation are odd and $r$ must be even. If $v$ is even let $v=2k$ and $r = 2m-1$, then the equation becomes $$ 10k^2\pm 2k-26m^2+34m = 11 $$ which is impossible since the LHS is even. If If $v$ is odd, let $v=2k-1$ and $r = 2m$, then the equation becomes $$ 10k^2 + (\pm 2 - 10)k-26m^2+8m = 2\mp 1 $$ which again is impossible since the LHS is even and the RHS is odd. So case (A) does not lead to any solutions.

(B) $w = 13 r -9$ leads to $$ 5v^2\pm 2v = 13r^2-18r+6 $$ In this equation, either $v$ (and hence the LHS) is even and $r$ is even, or $v$ is odd, both sides of the equation are odd and $r$ must be odd. If $v$ is even let $v=2k$ and $r = 2m$, then the equation becomes $$ 10k^2\pm 2k-26m^2+18m = 3 $$ which is impossible since the LHS is even. If If $v$ is odd, let $v=2k-1$ and $r = 2m-1$, then the equation becomes $$ 10k^2 + (\pm 2 - 10)k-26m^2+44m = 16 \mp 1 $$ which again is impossible since the LHS is even and the RHS is odd. So case (B) does not lead to any solutions either.

Therefore, there does not exist a $4$-tuple of positive integers $\{d,x,y,z\}$ such that $$ 2d-1 = x^2\\ 5d-1 = y^2 \\ 13d-1 = z^2 $$ and this is what we set out to prove.


I must admit that if given this problem in a timed contest setting today, I would probably miss it. But back in 1986 it would have been one of the easy ones.

However, I now see that this does not answer the real question, which is how far you can go and always have all the pairs yield squares when you form $ab-1$.

$\endgroup$
0
-1
$\begingroup$

The system of Diophantine equations like $$\begin{cases} 2d-1 = x^2\\ 5d-1 = y^2 \\ 13d-1 = z^2 \end{cases}$$ can be systematically computationally solved by considering an equivalent system (with eliminated $d$): $$\begin{cases} 5 x^2 - 2 y^2 = -3\\ 13x^2 - 2 z^2 = -11 \end{cases}$$ and using Theorem 6 from this paper of mine. This particular system happens to have no solutions.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.