15
$\begingroup$

Let $\mathbf{H}P^\infty$ denote the infinite-dimensional quaternionic projective space. The inclusion of its bottom cell defines a map $S^4 \to \mathbf{H}P^\infty$. Does this extend to a map $\Omega S^5 \to \mathbf{H}P^\infty = BSU(2)$?

Since $\Omega S^5$ is the James construction on $S^4$, this question would be very easy to answer (in the positive) if $\mathbf{H}P^\infty$ was a homotopy associative H-space --- but it's known that this is not true. (If $Y$ is a homotopy associative H-space, then any map $X\to Y$ from a path-connected space $X$ admits a unique extension to a H-space map $\Omega \Sigma X \to Y$.) However, the composite $S^4\to BSU(2) \to BSU$ does extend to a map $f_\xi:\Omega S^5\to BSU$ classifying a bundle $\xi$ over $\Omega S^5$; it is easy to see that the Chern classes $c_i(\xi)$ vanish for $i\geq 3$, so the map $f_\xi$ factors, at least on cohomology, through $BSU(2)$.

One natural expectation for the desired map is that it gives a map of fiber sequences from the EHP fiber sequence $S^2 \to \Omega S^3 \to \Omega S^5$ to the Hopf invariant fiber sequence $$S^2 \to \mathbf{C}P^\infty = BS^1 \to \mathbf{H}P^\infty = BS^3$$ via the map $\Omega S^3 \to \mathbf{C}P^\infty$ extending the inclusion of the bottom cell of the target. In fact, thinking along these lines shows that we'd get the desired map if $S^2$ was a loop space, which it isn't.

An approach to constructing the desired map comes from equivariant considerations. Namely, the bottom $C_2$-equivariant cell of $\mathbf{C}P^\infty$ under the complex conjugation action is the one-point compactification $S^\rho$ of the regular representation $\rho$ of $C_2$. This gives a map $\Omega S^{\rho+1} \to \mathbf{C}P^\infty$, and hence a map $(\Omega S^{\rho+1})_{hC_2} \to (\mathbf{C}P^\infty)_{hC_2} = \mathbf{H}P^\infty$. To get the desired map, it therefore suffices to construct a nonequivariant map $\Omega S^5 \to (\Omega S^{\rho+1})_{hC_2}$, but it's not clear to me how/whether such a map exists.

I'd like to remark that looping the map $\Omega S^5\to \mathbf{H}P^\infty$ defines a map $\Omega^2 S^5\to S^3$. Such a map is known to exist if we require that it be degree $2$ on the bottom cell of $\Omega^2 S^5$ (it is the map appearing in work of Cohen-Moore-Neisendorfer).

$\endgroup$
8
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ This isn’t relevant to your question, but you seem to claim that \Omega\Sigma X is the “free homotopy associative H-space” on X, which certainly isn’t true, right? Am I misunderstanding something? $\endgroup$ May 5 '19 at 20:21
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @DylanWilson This is in fact true (at least if X is path-connected), and was the original statement proved by James (Theorem 1.11 in his "Reduced product spaces"). $\endgroup$
    – skd
    May 5 '19 at 20:38
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Theorem 1.11 in that paper says that the James construction is the free topological monoid with the basepoint of X acting as the identity, which is not the same... did you mean to cite a different theorem? I’m really having trouble believing the statement is true... $\endgroup$ May 5 '19 at 23:43
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Maybe you mean 1.8? That says H-spaces X are a retract of \Loops\Sigma X, but surely the splitting is not unique. You can use that to build a map like the one you mention though. Anyway- I’m happy to forget about it, just wanted to make sure there wasn’t some contradiction lurking in my brain. $\endgroup$ May 5 '19 at 23:49
  • 7
    $\begingroup$ The inclusion of the bottom cell does not even extend to the 8-skeleton. The attaching map of the 8-cell in the James construction is the Whitehead product [i_4,i_4] which is twice the Hopf map plus the suspension of the Blakers-Massey element (the generator of \pi_6(S^3)). You would need the Whitehead product to be twice the Hopf map in order for the extension to the 8-skeleton to exist. $\endgroup$ May 6 '19 at 14:06
2
$\begingroup$

[I should've posted this answer a long time ago, given that it was answered in the comments.] In order to extend the map $S^4\to \mathbf{H}P^\infty$ to a map from $J_2(S^4)$, the composite of $[\iota_4,\iota_4]:S^7\to S^4$ with the inclusion of $S^4$ into $\mathbf{H}P^\infty$ must be null. This is not true: the Whitehead product $[\iota_4, \iota_4]\in \pi_7(S^4)$ would have to be $2\nu$ to get the desired extension, but Equation 5.8 of Toda's composition methods book says that $[\iota_4, \iota_4] = \pm (2\nu - \Sigma \nu')$, where $\nu'\in \pi_6(S^3)$ is the Blakers-Massey element.

As Gustavo Granja points out in the comments, there is a $p$-local analogue of this (with $p>2$): the map $S^4\to \mathbf{H}P^\infty$ extends to a map $J_{(p-1)/2}(S^4)\to \mathbf{H}P^\infty$, and the composite with the $(p+1)/2$-fold Whitehead product $[\iota_4, \cdots, \iota_4]: S^{2p+1}\to J_{(p-1)/2}(S^4)$ produces $\alpha_1\in \pi_{2p+1}(\mathbf{H}P^\infty)$. (See also this answer: Is $\mathbb{H}P^\infty_{(p)}$ an H-space?.) This implies that there is no extension to a map $J_{(p+1)/2}(S^4)\to \mathbf{H}P^\infty$.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ More generally, localized at an odd prime $p$, $\mathbb{H}P^{\frac{p-1}{2}}$ is equivalent to the $(p-1)/2$-th stage of the James construction $J_{\frac{p-1}{2}} S^5$ as there are no obstructions to extending the identity on the bottom cell. This map can't be extended to $J^{\frac{p+1}{2}} S^5$ because $P^1$ acts non-trivially on the generator of $H^4(\mathbb{H}P^\infty;\mathbb Z/p)$. $\endgroup$ May 12 '20 at 12:58
  • $\begingroup$ Yep! Edited my answer. (Also, I think you meant to write S^4 where you wrote S^5.) $\endgroup$
    – skd
    May 12 '20 at 15:42
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, should be $S^4$. $\endgroup$ May 12 '20 at 18:52

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.