1
$\begingroup$

Given an hyperbolic IFS $(X,\{f_i:i=1,\ldots,N\})$ and denoting its code space by $\Sigma_N = \{1,\ldots,N\}^{\mathbb{N}}$ and the generated fractal set by $\mathcal{A}$.

There is a continuous and surjective mapping $\gamma: \Sigma_N \to \mathcal{A}$ given by $\gamma(\sigma) = \lim\limits_{n \to \infty} f_{\sigma(n)}(x)$ where $x$ can be chosen arbitrarily in $X$.

Denoting for $f:X \to X$ by $\overline{f}:H(X) \to H(X)$ the function $\overline{f}(A) = \{f(a):a \in A\}$ where $H(X)$ is the hyperspace of compact subsets of $X$. The author makes the following remark:

Suppose that $\sigma \in \Sigma_N$ and let $A_{\sigma(n)} = \overline{f}_{\sigma(n)}(A)$ for $A \in H(X)$. Then the above theorem states that $\gamma(\sigma) = \bigcap\limits_{n \in \mathbb{N}} A_{\sigma(n)}$

How can I show this remark is true?

My try

$f(X) \subset X$. This is because $f:X \to X$. The strict inequality follows if one takes $x_0,y_0 \in X$ such that $diam(X) = d(x_0,y_0)$. It is clear that $x_0 \in f(X)$ and $y_0 \in f(X)$ cannot happen simultaneously, since the diameter decreases strictly:

$$diam(f(X)) = \sup\{d(x,y).x,y \in f(X)\} = \sup\{d(f(x'),f(y')).x',y' \in X\} \le \lambda \cdot \sup\{d(x',y').x',y' \in X\} = \lambda \cdot diam(X) < diam(X)$$

where $\lambda < 1$. By monotonicity, $f(f(X)) \subseteq f(X)$ and then do induction. For this decreasing sequence, one has $\cap_{i = 1}^n \{\overline{f}_{\sigma(i)}(X)\} = \overline{f}_{\sigma(n)}(X)$ so $\cap_{i = 1}^\infty \{\overline{f}_{\sigma(i)}(X)\} = \lim\limits_{n \to \infty} \overline{f}_{\sigma(n)}(X) = \lim\limits_{n \to \infty} f_{\sigma(n)}(x)$ for $x \in X$.

But this cannot be applied to any $A \in H(X)$. It can be applied though to sets such that $f(S) \subseteq S$ like the fractal set $\mathcal{A}$.

References

These lecture notes.

Massopust's Interpolation and approximation with splines and fractals

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

$\newcommand{\de}{\delta} \newcommand{\ga}{\gamma} \newcommand{\si}{\sigma} \newcommand{\ep}{\varepsilon}$ First here, $\bigcap\limits_{n \in \mathbb{N}} A_{\sigma(n)}$ is a subset of $X$, whereas $\gamma(\sigma)$ is an element of $X$. So, in your second highlighted statement $\gamma(\sigma)$ should be replaced by $\{\gamma(\sigma)\}$. (This is using the notations on pages 25 and and 22 of the lecture notes: $$A_{\sigma(n)}:=f_{\sigma(n)}(A),\quad f_{\sigma(n)}:=f_{\sigma_1}\circ\dots\circ f_{\sigma_n} $$ for $\sigma=(\sigma_1,\sigma_2,\dots)\in\Sigma_N=\{1,\ldots,N\}^{\mathbb{N}}$.)

Even after that, your second highlighted statement will be definitely false if e.g. $A=\emptyset\ne X$. It will also be false if e.g. $X=[0,1]$, $f_1(x)=x/2$ for $x\in[0,1]$, $f_2,\dots,f_N$ are any contraction maps of $X=[0,1]$ into itself, $A$ is the nonempty compact set $\{1\}$, and $\si=(1,1,\dots)$.

However, it is easy to see that \begin{equation*} \{\gamma(\sigma)\} = \lim_n A_{\si(n)} \end{equation*} for any nonempty bounded $A\subseteq X$, in the sense \begin{equation*} d(A_{\si(n)},\ga(\si)):=\sup\{d(y,\ga(\si))\colon y\in A_{\si(n)}\}\to0,\tag{1} \end{equation*} where $d$ is the distance function on $X$. Indeed, let $M\in[0,\infty)$ be the diameter of the bounded set $A$. Then for some $r\in[0,1)$, all $\si\in\Sigma_N$, and all natural $n$ the diameter of the set $A_{\si(n)}$ will be $\le M r^n$. So, for any $x\in A$ \begin{equation*} d(A_{\si(n)},\ga(\si))\le d(A_{\si(n)},f_{\si(n)}(x))+d(f_{\si(n)}(x),\ga(\si)) \le M r^n+d(f_{\si(n)}(x),\ga(\si))\to0 \end{equation*} so that (1) follows.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ the author informed me that $N>1$ is assumed in the book, apparently, that should solve the problem, but how? $\endgroup$ – Javier Apr 10 at 8:07
  • $\begingroup$ @Javier : Of course, just assuming that $N>1$ will not make that statement in the book true. I have modified, slightly, the second one of my two little counterexamples, to allow $N$ to be $>1$. $\endgroup$ – Iosif Pinelis Apr 10 at 13:45
  • $\begingroup$ $N$ denotes the number of mappings in the IFS, in your example $N = 1$ right? $\endgroup$ – Javier Apr 10 at 16:09
  • $\begingroup$ @Javier : No, in that counterexample $N$ can be any natural number. However, because we take $\sigma=(1,1,\dots)$, I did not have to specify $f_2,\dots,f_N$ -- they can be any contraction maps. I have now added this detail. $\endgroup$ – Iosif Pinelis Apr 10 at 16:24

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.