7
$\begingroup$

It's pretty clear that for a simplicial complex $\Delta$, shellability of the complex implies that it is homotopy equivalent to a wedge of spheres. However, does the converse hold? That is, does $\Delta$ being homotopy equivalent to a wedge of spheres imply shellability? Thanks!

$\endgroup$
1
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ I'm pretty sure that the answer is "no", but I would nevertheless enjoy if someone could describe the smallest counterexample i.e. the smallest non-shellable sphere (is it a 2-sphere or a 3-sphere?) $\endgroup$ Apr 8, 2019 at 20:20

2 Answers 2

13
$\begingroup$

No. There are unshellable n-spheres for all n≥3:

Lickorish, W. B. R., Unshellable triangulations of spheres, Eur. J. Comb. 12, No. 6, 527-530 (1991). ZBL0746.57007.

$\endgroup$
7
$\begingroup$

As @j.c. says, the answer is "no", and it is good to know that there are non-shellable triangulations of spheres.

However, it is even easier to find counterexamples, that are not shellable because of topological obstructions. I'll give two examples:

  1. The annulus is homotopy equivalent to $S^1$, but no triangulation is shellable (since a shellable 2-dimensional complex is topologically a bouquet of 2-spheres, not 1-spheres).

  2. More deeply, the wedge of 2 or more spheres of dimension at least 2 is never shellable, nor even Cohen-Macaulay. (Note the lack of the word "homotopy type" in the previous sentence!) This is because if you take two $d$-spheres and glue them together at the point $v$, then the link of $v$ is disconnected of dimension $d-1$, hence not shellable. Since the link of every vertex in a shellable complex is shellable, this gives the desired non-shellability.

The fragility of shellability in this respect can be seen as a good thing: there are lots of tools to compute homotopy type of a complex, but shellability (when carefully examined) tells you a fair bit about the "homeomorphism type" of the complex.

By the way, the smallest dimension of a non-shellable sphere is 3. The 1978 papers of Danaraj and Klee are one reference for this; the first paper I'm aware of that uses the word shelling, "Isotopy in 3-manifolds- Isotopic deformations of 2-cells and 3-cells" by Donald Sanderson, is another.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.