3
$\begingroup$

Background

Let $M$ be a compact, oriented Riemannian manifold with boundary, with $\text{vol}$ the Riemannian volume form. Let $\nu$ be the outwards unit normal vector field on $\partial M$ and $\nu^\flat$ its dual 1-form (under musical isomorphism). Then let $\text{vol}_\partial=\iota_\nu \text{vol}$ orient $\partial M$ (standard). The Riemannian metric induces an $L^2$ structure on $\Omega^k$ (this is the dot product for differential forms, which differs from the dot product for tensor fields by a factor of $\frac{1}{k!}$).

Let $\jmath:\partial M \to M$ be the inclusion map. Then we can define the tangential and normal part of a differential form near the boundary, following Günter Schwarz $$ \forall w \in \Omega^k(M): \mathbf{t}w = \iota_\nu(\nu^\flat\wedge w), \mathbf{n}w = w - \mathbf{t}w = \nu^\flat\wedge\iota_\nu w $$ Obviously $\mathbf{n}f=0 \; \forall f\in \Omega^0(M)=C^\infty(M)$ and $\star$ (Hodge star) is $L^2$ isomorphism with $\star \mathbf{n} = \mathbf{t} \star,\; \mathbf{n} \star= \star \mathbf{t} $.

Now define $\Omega^k_{\text{hom}N}(M)=\{w\in \Omega^k: \mathbf{n}w=0,\mathbf{n}dw=0\}$ (relative Neumann boundary condition), and $\mathcal{H}^k_N =\{w\in \Omega^k: \mathbf{n}w=0,dw=0,\delta w=0\}$ (Neumann harmonic fields), where $\delta$ is the codifferential. Let ${(\mathcal{H}^k_N)}^{\perp}$ be the $L^2$ orthogonal complement in $\Omega^k$.

Let $\Delta=-(d\delta +\delta d)$ be the usual Hodge Laplacian (with negative spectrum). Then if we restrict its domain, we get the Hodge-Neumann Laplacian $\Delta_N : \Omega^k_{\text{hom}N}(M) \cap {(\mathcal{H}^k_N)}^{\perp}\to {(\mathcal{H}^k_N)}^{\perp} $ which is $C^\infty$ homeomorphism and essentially $L^2$-self-adjoint. The inverse is called the Neumann potential, which is a compact operator on ${(\mathcal{H}^k_N)}^{\perp}$ (subspace of $L^2$), so there is an orthonormal basis consisting of eigenvectors (spectral theorem for compact operators). See Günter Schwarz for more details.

The formulas for integration by parts are:

$$ \ll du,v \gg_M = \ll u,\delta v \gg_M + \ll \jmath^* u, \jmath^* \iota_\nu v \gg_{\partial M} $$ $$ \mathcal{D}(u,v)= \ll -\Delta u,v \gg_M + \ll \jmath^* \iota_\nu du, \jmath^* v \gg_{\partial M} - \ll \jmath^* \delta u, \jmath^* \iota_\nu v \gg_{\partial M} $$ where $\ll \cdot, \cdot \gg_M$ is the $L^2$ product on $M$ and $\mathcal{D}(u,v) = \ll du, dv \gg_M + \ll \delta u, \delta v \gg_M $ is called the Dirichlet integral. On $D(\Delta_N)$, we also have the Poincare-Hodge inequality (consider $0 \in \mathbb{N}$)

$$ ||w||_{W^{s+1,p}} \sim ||dw||_{W^{s,p}} + ||\delta w||_{W^{s,p}} \; \forall s\in \mathbb{N}, \forall p \in [2,+\infty) $$

Question

Let $w \in \Omega^k$ and $w \in D(\Delta_N^K)\; \forall K \in \mathbb{N}$. Can we show there exists $C_{k,K,M}\geq 0$ such that $$ \int_M |w|^{2K} \Delta(|w|^2) \leq C_{k,K,M} \int_M |w|^{2K+2} \; \forall K \in \mathbb{N} $$

where $|.|$ is the fiber norm induced by the Riemannian metric (again, the differential forms version differs from the tensor version by a factor of $\frac{1}{k!}$). If this is true, it would have non-trivial implications for index theory, Hodge theory and fluid dynamics (being a form of dissipativity). It is certainly true (in fact $C_{k,K,M}=0$) when $w$ is a scalar function ($w=f$,$\partial_\nu f =0$) or $\partial M = \emptyset$, or that the metric is flat. So already most possible cases for PDE are covered. I want to know if this is true for general M. If that fails, how about $$ \ll |w|^{2K}w, \Delta w \gg_M \leq C_{k,K,M} \int_M |w|^{2K+2} \; \forall K \in \mathbb{N} $$ (which is a weaker statement, following from the previous by Bochner's formula)

My attempt

$\mathbf{n}w=0$ and $\mathbf{n}dw=0$ are equivalent to $\iota_\nu w = 0$ and $\iota_\nu dw = 0$. Integration by parts immediately yields

$$ \begin{align} \ll \Delta(|w|^2), |w|^{2K} \gg_M & = - \ll d(|w|^2), d(|w|^{2K}) \gg_M + \ll \partial_\nu(|w|^2), |w|^{2K} \gg_{\partial M} \\ & \leq \; \ll \partial_\nu(|w|^2), |w|^{2K} \gg_{\partial M} = 2 \ll \nabla_\nu w, |w|^{2K} w \gg_{\partial M} \\ & = \frac{2}{K+1} \int_{\partial M} \partial_\nu(|w|^{2(K+1)}) = \frac{2}{K+1} \int_M \Delta(|w|^{2(K+1)}) \end{align}$$

The last 2 equalities look nice (for future applications), but I'm not sure if they are useful here.

We shall use Penrose's abstract index notation (also confer Wald's General Relativity). Write $a_1,..,a_{n-1}$ for abstract indices representing coordinates on $\partial M$ and $n$ representing the outwards normal direction. Let $\nabla$ be the Levi-Civita connection, and $\partial$ be the ordinary derivative (in local coordinates) then

$$ \begin{align} 0 =(dw)_{na_1...a_k} & = \nabla_n w_{a_1...a_k} + \sum_i (\pm 1) \nabla_{a_i} w_{na_1...\widehat{a_i}...a_k} \\ &= \partial_n w_{a_1...a_k} + \sum_i (\pm 1) \partial_{a_i} w_{na_1...\widehat{a_i}...a_k} = \partial_n w_{a_1...a_k} \end{align} $$ since $ w_{na_1...\widehat{a_i}...a_k} = 0$. But I am not certain whether $\nabla_\nu w = 0$ or $\partial_\nu (|w|^2)=0$ (unless it's a flat metric).

Plugging this in, we get $$ \begin{align} k! \ll \nabla_\nu w, |w|^{2K} w \gg_{\partial M} & =\int_{\partial M} \nabla_n w_{a_1...a_k} |w|^{2K}w^{a_1...a_k} \\ & = \sum_i (\pm 1) \int_{\partial M} \nabla_{a_i}w_{na_1...\widehat{a_i}...a_k} |w|^{2K}w^{a_1...a_k} \end{align} $$

But the catch is that $\nabla_{a_i}w_{na_1...\widehat{a_i}...a_k} \neq \nabla_{a_i}(\iota_\nu w)_{a_1...\widehat{a_i}...a_k} $, so I'm stuck.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

I think I've found the answer (maybe writing this down has made me think harder about it).

The application I have in mind uses interpolation, so $K\in \mathbb{N}$ was really just for simplicity's sake, and I can assume $K$ to be odd, $K+1=2L$, $L\in \mathbb{N}$.

Continuing from the end of my attempt: $$ \begin{align} &\int_{\partial M} \nabla_{a_i}w_{na_1...\widehat{a_i}...a_k} |w|^{2K}w^{a_1...a_k} \\ &= \int_{\partial M} \nabla_{a_i}{(\iota_\nu w)}_{a_1...\widehat{a_i}...a_k} |w|^{2K}w^{a_1...a_k} - \int_{\partial M} {(\iota_{\nabla_{a_i}\nu} w)}_{a_1...\widehat{a_i}...a_k} |w|^{2K}w^{a_1...a_k} \\ \end{align} $$ Here the first term vanishes as $\iota_\nu w=0$, while the second term spits out some Christoffel symbols. Since the manifold is compact, we get $O( \int_{\partial M} |w|^{2K+2})$.

We can control this error by the negative quantity (which I previously threw away, prematurely) $$ - \ll d(|w|^2), d(|w|^{2K}) \gg_M = -K \int_M \left|d(|w|^2)\right|^2 |w|^{2(K-1)} $$ Let $f=|w|^2$, then we want $$C\int_{\partial M} f^{K+1} - \int_M |df|^2 f^{K-1} \lesssim \int_M f^{K+1}$$ where $C$ is some constant (depending on $k,K,M$). As $K+1=2L$, set $F=f^L$, and our problem, after simplification, becomes $$C\int_{\partial M} F^2 - \int_M |dF|^2 \lesssim \int_M F^2$$

This is just Ehrling's inequality. As $\tau:H^1(M)\to L^2(\partial M)$ compact and $H^1(M)\hookrightarrow L^2(M)$ continuous, we have $$ \forall \epsilon >0, \exists C_\epsilon > 0: ||\tau F||_{L^2(\partial M)} \leq \epsilon ||F||_{H^1} + C_\epsilon ||F||_{L^2} $$

I am very excited that this turns out to be true. This further confirms my belief that the above setting is, in a sense, universal.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.