9
$\begingroup$

A simplicial poset is a finite poset $P$ with minimial element $\hat{0}$ such that every interval $[\hat{0},x]$ is isomorphic to a Boolean lattice. Simplicial posets are generalizations of simplicial complexes (see, e.g., http://math.mit.edu/~rstan/pubs/pubfiles/82.pdf). Now, one way to define a matroid is as a simplicial complex for which the restriction to any subset of vertices is a pure complex. We could then naively define a simplicial poset $P$ to be matroidal if $P\setminus F$ is always graded, where $F$ is the order filter generated by any subset of atoms of $P$.

Have these matroidal simplicial posets been studied at all? Are there conjectures (e.g., about face numbers) for them?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Are they Cohen-Macaulay posets? Is the ring $A_P$ or $\tilde{A}_P$ of your reference a level algebra? $\endgroup$ – Richard Stanley Apr 5 '19 at 15:58
  • $\begingroup$ @RichardStanley: It might make sense to restrict to the Cohen-Macaulay case. I was in particular thinking there might be an analog of your matroid $h$-vector conjecture here. $\endgroup$ – Sam Hopkins Apr 5 '19 at 16:05
  • $\begingroup$ (It might even make sense to restrict to Gorenstein* $P$.) $\endgroup$ – Sam Hopkins Apr 5 '19 at 16:29
  • $\begingroup$ Are there "interesting" Gorenstein* matroidal simplicial posets? The only Gorenstein* geometric lattices are boolean algebras. $\endgroup$ – Richard Stanley Apr 5 '19 at 21:37
1
$\begingroup$

If X is a compact, connected d-dimensional PL-manifold, then it has a simplicial poset triangulation with d+1 vertices. This is one of the foundational results of theory of crystallizations of manifolds. See, for instance, "A graph theoretical representation of PL-manifolds- a survey on crystallizations", Ferri, Gagliardi and Grasselli, Aequationes Mathematicae, 31 (1986), 121-141, for a survey. Such a simplicial poset would be an example of a matrioidal simplicial poset and includes lots of topological types including interesting Gorenstein* topological types. I do not know if the PL is needed for the proof, or is just to make sure there exists at least one triangulation.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I looked up the reference to the crystallization theory and it is very nice. But I don't understand immediately why these posets will satisfy the "matroidal" condition. Is that easy to see? $\endgroup$ – Sam Hopkins Aug 29 '19 at 0:33

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.