1
$\begingroup$

I couldn't find this paper (preferably english translation) on the web, math.stackexchange, or mathoverflow.net; could someone please point me to the document to read? Thanks!

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Usually referred to as Borel-Serre. $\endgroup$
    – ssx
    Commented Mar 21, 2019 at 19:39
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ To be more explicit about the ref., it's Borel, Serre, Le theoreme de Riemann-Roch, d'apres Grothendieck. Google it, and you'll find the link. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 21, 2019 at 19:48

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

As pointed out in the comments, Grothendieck didn't publish these results. They appeared in

Armand Borel and Jean-Pierre Serre, Le théorème de Riemann-Roch, Bulletin de la S. M. F., tome 86 (1958), p. 97-136 doi:10.24033/bsmf.1500

The paper is subtitled (d'après des résultats inédits de A. GROTHENDIECK).

$\endgroup$
4
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ There are also handwritten notes by Grothendieck (on the Marseille archive webpage), but I find them hard to read. Apparently Grothendieck gave a course on RR at the College de France, but I am not sure if these notes were published. $\endgroup$
    – ssx
    Commented Mar 21, 2019 at 21:08
  • $\begingroup$ @EinfacherSchreiberling I guess you mean the second item here: grothendieck.umontpellier.fr/archives-grothendieck $\endgroup$
    – David Roberts
    Commented Mar 22, 2019 at 5:22
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ "Classes de faisceaux et théorème de Riemann-Roch" is also included in Exposé 0 of SGA 6 (LNM 225). $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 22, 2019 at 7:31
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ library.msri.org/books/sga/sga/pdf/sga6.pdf (52MB!) Official Springer version is at doi.org/10.1007/BFb0066284 & starts on page 20. $\endgroup$
    – David Roberts
    Commented Mar 22, 2019 at 12:32

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .