2
$\begingroup$

In [C Mclarty] we read

[Noether] project was to get abstract algebra away from thinking about operations on elements, such as addition or multiplication of elements in groups or rings. Her algebra would describe structures in terms of the relations between selected subsets (such as normal subgroups of groups) and homomorphisms. Noether aimed to organize algebra around homomorphism and isomorphism theorems for each type of structure. And she meant to organize all mathematics around this algebra.

I was unable to find references of definitions of algebraic structures in this spirit.

This program was achieved? There are references of definitions following Noether’s project?

Why N Bourbaki did not adopt it (for the definition of its pure structures of algebra)?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Most likely, this project, assuming it really existed (the author might have exaggerated) was not achieved (otherwise your book would formulate differently, and otherwise reference would be known), and since it was not achieved, it was not an option for Bourbaki (or other authors) to adopt it. $\endgroup$ – YCor Mar 11 at 7:23
  • $\begingroup$ I do not know if Noether had such a thing in mind, but an obvious framework to achieve this would be to take category’s theory as ground to develop algebra. Then it was a choice of Bourbaki not to adopt it. $\endgroup$ – Denis-Charles Cisinski Mar 13 at 10:04

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.