8
$\begingroup$

I have some questions about two statements from Bosch's "Algebraic Geometry and Commutative Algebra" about algebraic varieties (page 479). Since I still don't have the permission to add images I quote the relevant excerpt:

...The notion of properness has been introduced in 9.5/4. It means that the structural morphism $p: A \to Spec(K)$ is of finite type, separated, and universally closed. For the property of smoothness see 8.5/1. It follows from 8.5/15 in conjunction with 2.4/19 that all stalks $\mathcal{O}_{A,x}$ of a smooth $K$-group scheme $A$ are integral domains. Since abelian varieties are required to be irreducible, they give rise to integral schemes. Also let us mention that for $K$-group schemes of finite type smooth is equivalent to geometrically reduced, which means that all stalks of the structure sheaf of $A×_K \bar{K}$ are reduced. In addition, let us point out that for $K$-group schemes of finite type the property irreducible can be checked after base change with $\bar{K}/K$ so that we may replace irreducible by geometrically irreducible...

We fix an abelian variety $A$ over field $K$. By definition an abelian variety over $K$ is a proper smooth $K$-group scheme that is irreducible.

Following two questions:

  1. Why is for a $K$-group scheme of finite type smooth equivalent to geometrically reduced?

  2. Why under same conditions as in 1. (so $K$-group scheme of finite type) the property irreducible is equivlaent to geometrically irreducible?

Remark: Here I previously asked this question in MSE: https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/3136827/abelian-varieties

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ I took the liberty of changing the title of your question. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 7, 2019 at 19:43

1 Answer 1

9
$\begingroup$

Let $G/K$ be a group scheme of finite type.

  1. $G/K$ is smooth if and only if $\bar G / \bar K$ is smooth. Suppose $\bar G$ is reduced, then it has a smooth $\bar K$-point $x$ (because we are over an algebraically closed field). But $\bar G(\bar K)$ acts transitively on itself, so now every closed point of $\bar G$ is smooth, so $\bar G$ is smooth. (And of course if $\bar G$ is smooth then it is reduced.)

  2. The point is that $G$ comes with a section, the neutral element $e\in G(K)$. Suppose that $\bar G$ is reducible, then since $\bar G^{\rm red}$ is reduced and hence smooth, we see that $\bar G$ is disconnected. If $\bar G^\circ$ is the connected component of the neutral element $e$, then since the Galois group ${\rm Gal}(\bar K/K)$ acts on $\bar G$ preserving $e$, it has to preserve $\bar G^\circ$, and so $\bar G^\circ$ descends to give a component of $G$, so $G$ is disconnected.

$\endgroup$
8
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for your answer. One penible question: When you talk about the ${\rm Gal}(\bar K/K)$-action on $\bar G = G \otimes \bar{K}$ do you implicitely mean the action on "points" $\bar{G}(\bar{K})= Hom(\bar{K}, \bar{G})$ via composing $\phi \mapsto \phi \circ g$ for a $g \in {\rm Gal}(\bar K/K)$ or the action via "base change" namely that $g$ induces automorphism on $\bar{G}$ via $id \otimes g$? $\endgroup$
    – user267839
    Commented Mar 7, 2019 at 21:06
  • $\begingroup$ @Karl_Peter I think the latter action induces the former on $\bar K$-points. Here it is enough to say that the profinite group ${\rm Gal}(\bar K/K)$ acts continuously on the underlying topological space $|\bar G|$ of $\bar G$ (or just the subspace of closed points $\bar G(\bar K)$) and the quotient space is identified with $|G|$. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 7, 2019 at 22:56
  • $\begingroup$ But what is concretely the "canonical" action of ${\rm Gal}(\bar K/K)$ on the underlying topological space $|\bar G|$? $\endgroup$
    – user267839
    Commented Mar 7, 2019 at 23:36
  • $\begingroup$ The argument in the answer that the identity component of $G$ over the algebraic closure of $K$ is defined over $K$ applies only in characteristic zero. Otherwise the proof is more difficult. $\endgroup$
    – anon
    Commented Mar 9, 2019 at 7:01
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Karl_Peter See Section b of Chapter 1 of Milne: Algebraic Groups, The theory of group schemes of finite type over a field, Cambridge UP, 2017. $\endgroup$
    – anon
    Commented Mar 9, 2019 at 19:20

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .