14
$\begingroup$

Assume that $X$ is a tree such that every vertex has infinite degree, and a discrete group $G$ acts on this tree properly (with finite stabilizers) and transitively.

Is it true that $G$ contains a non-abelian free subgroup?

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Properly implies finite stabilizers $\endgroup$
    – YCor
    Commented Mar 1, 2019 at 23:09

2 Answers 2

16
$\begingroup$

Yes.

You're assuming more than what's necessary.

For an isometric group action on a Gromov-hyperbolic space, you have 5 possibilities (Gromov's classification):

  • (a) bounded orbits
  • (b) horocyclic (fixes a unique point at infinity, no loxodromic element; preserves "horospheres")
  • (c) axial (preserves an axis, on which some element acts loxodromically)
  • (d) focal (fixes a unique point at infinity, existence of a loxodromic element)
  • (e) general type (= other): implies the existence of a non-abelian free subgroup acting metrically properly.

(a), (b), (c) are clearly ruled out in your setting (transitivity, and valency; valency $\ge 3$ would be enough). (d) is ruled out because discrete groups have no metrically proper focal action at all. So (e) holds.

The case of actions on trees is a useful motivating baby case illustrating the above "classification"; all cases can actually occur.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you! And if I assume that stabilizers are amenable, will it be the same? $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 1, 2019 at 23:40
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @MariaGerasimova you have to discard the focal case. Writing, for instance, the solvable group $\mathbf{Z}\wr\mathbf{Z}$ as an ascending HNN extension (w.r.t. an endomorphism with image of finite index), you make it act vertex-transitively on a tree with infinite valency (with abelian stabilizers). So you need to explicitly exclude the case of a fixed point at infinity. $\endgroup$
    – YCor
    Commented Mar 1, 2019 at 23:56
4
$\begingroup$

The geometry of simplicial trees can be extended in two directions: Gromov-hyperbolic spaces and CAT(0) cube complexes. Yves' answer is based on the first point of view. About cube complexes, we have the following statement (essentially due to Caprace and Sageev):

Theorem: Let $G$ be a group acting on a finite-dimensional CAT(0) cube complex $X$. Either $G$ contains a non-abelian free subgroup or it contains a finite-index subgroup which decomposes as a short exact sequence $$1 \to L \to G \to \mathbb{Z}^n \to 1$$ where $n \leq \dim(X)$ and where $L$ is locally $X$-elliptic (ie., any finitely generated subgroup of $L$ has a bounded orbit in $X$).

As a consequence, if a Tits' alternative is known for cube-stabilisers, then it is possible to deduce a Tits' alternative in the entire group. In the particular case of trees, we have:

Corollary: Let $G$ be a group acting on a tree $T$. Either $G$ contains a non-abelian free subgroup or it contains a finite-index* subgroup which decomposes as a short exact sequence $$1 \to L \to G \to Z \to 1$$ where $L$ is locally $T$-elliptic and where $Z$ is trivial or infinite cyclic.

Of course, a direct argument can be given here.

Sketch of proof of the corollary. We distinguish two cases.

First, assume that $G$ has a finite orbit in $\partial T$. So it contains a finite-index subgroup $H$ which fixes a point $\xi \in \partial T$. Fix a basepoint $x \in T$. Notice that, for every $g \in H$, the intersection $g [x,\xi) \cap [x,\xi)$ contains an infinite geodesic ray (as $g$ fixes $\xi$). Consequently, $g$ defines a translation of length $\tau(g)$ on a subray of $[x,\xi)$. (Here $\tau(g)$ is positive if the translation is directed to $\xi$ and negative otherwise.) The key observation is that $$\tau : H \to \mathbb{Z}$$ defines a homomorphism whose kernel contains only elliptic elements (as each such element fixes pointwise a subray of $[x,\xi)$). Thus, we get the desired short exact sequence.

Next, assume that $G$ has infinite orbits in $\partial T$. Play ping-pong to construct a non-abelian free subgroup. $\square$

*As noticed by Yves Cornulier in the comments, the subgroup can be always taken with index at most two.

$\endgroup$
10
  • $\begingroup$ You seem to assume (metric) properness at some point. Both the theorem and its corollary are false otherwise. Anyway I guess that the Caprace-Sageev theory is powerful enough to encompass non-proper actions. $\endgroup$
    – YCor
    Commented Mar 2, 2019 at 9:58
  • $\begingroup$ I am not assuming anything about the action. Why do you think the statements shoudn't be correct? $\endgroup$
    – AGenevois
    Commented Mar 2, 2019 at 10:25
  • $\begingroup$ Ah, sorry, it's confusing (at least to me) that "locally elliptic", which I usually know as an intrinsic property of the group, is used here as a property of the action, especially since the conclusion is a mixture of intrinsic properties of $G$ (the homomorphism onto an abelian group is not related to the action, as stated here) and extrinsic (being locally elliptic). $\endgroup$
    – YCor
    Commented Mar 2, 2019 at 10:32
  • $\begingroup$ Still there's a minor error in the corollary: it can happen that $G$ is already acting locally elliptically (horocyclic case). Side remark: in the corollary, no need to pass to a finite index subgroup, except precisely in the case $G$ preserves an axis, where one might have to pass to a subgroup of index 2. $\endgroup$
    – YCor
    Commented Mar 2, 2019 at 10:34
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I replaced "elliptic" with "$X$-elliptic" to avoid confusion. I also corrected the mistake in the corollary, thank you. $\endgroup$
    – AGenevois
    Commented Mar 2, 2019 at 11:03

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .