Galois theory of endomorphism rings of irreducible representations Let $k$ be a field which I don't suppose to be algebraically closed. Then, the endomorphism ring of any irreducible representation of a finite group over $k$ is a division ring.
What is known about these division rings? When are they fields? When they are, are these fields Galois over $k$? At least, normal? When not, are the centers of the division rings Galois over $k$? What do we know about these centers?
If $k$ is a perfect field, do the irreducible representations themselves split into distinct irreducible representations over the algebraic closure of $k$, or can some be equal?
Sorry for this many questions that are probably well-known, but I can't find an introductory text on representation theory which takes non-algebraically closed fields seriously.
 A: Pete's reference and other remarks in his comments are absolutely the right place to look/thing to think about.  Let me make a slightly more elaborate remark, which may be helpful.
A key fact which helps one think about this sort of question is the following: if 
$V$ is a rep. of $G$ over $k$, and $l$ is a finite extension of $k$, 
then $End_{l[G]}(l\otimes_k V) = l\otimes_k End_{k[G]}(V).$  (This is easily checked.)
At least if $k$ is perfect, then when $V$ is irreducible over $k$ the base-change
$l\otimes_k V$ will be semisimple over $l$ (i.e. a direct sum of irreds.).
Given this, one can determine its structure (is it a sum of distinct irreds., say, or does it contain two copies of the same irrep.?) by looking at $End_{l[G]}(l\otimes_k V)$, which
as I already noted we can compute as $l\otimes_k End_{k[G]}(V)$.
Let's suppose that $l = \bar{k}$, since that's probably the case of greatest interest.
Then if $W$ is a direct sum of mutually non-isomorphic irreps., then $End_{\bar{k}[G]}(W)$
is a product of copies of $\bar{k}$, as many as there are summands of $W$.
(If $W = \oplus_i W_i,$ then we get one copy of $\bar{k}$ for each $W_i$, since $End_{\bar{k}[G]}(W) = \bar{k}$, but there are no maps between the different $W_i$,
since they are non-isomorphic by assumption.)   On the other hand, if say $W$ were 
a direct sum $W = W_1\oplus W_2,$ then $End_{\bar{k}[G]}(W) = M_2(\bar{k})$
(since $Hom_{\bar{k}[G]}(W_i,W_j) = \bar{k}$ for any choice of $i$ and $j$).
Now using our formula $End_{\bar{k}[G]}(\bar{k}\otimes_k V) = \bar{k}\otimes_k End_{k[G]}(V),$ we see that $\bar{k}[G]\otimes_k V$ is a direct sum of distinct
irreps. if and only if $End_{k[G]}(V)$ is a field (since it is precisely this case which
gives a product of copies of $\bar{k}$ when we tensor up with $\bar{k}$), while
$\bar{k}\otimes_k V$ will contain multiple copies of some irrep. if and only 
if $End_{k[G]}(V)$ is a non-commutative division ring, since then extending scalars to
$\bar{k}$ will give a non-trivial matrix ring over $\bar{k}$. (This explains Pete's remark about the quaternion group in his comment above.)
More precisely, we see that if $End_{k[G]}(V)$ is a division ring of dimension $n^2$
over its centre, which has say degree $d$ over $k$, then
$\bar{k}\otimes_k V$ will be a product of $n$ copies each of $d$ distinct irreps. over $\bar{k}$.
A: Concerning 

are the centers of the division rings Galois over $k$

A finite dim'l $k$-algebra $A$ is 
split provided $\operatorname{End}_A(S) = k$
for every simple $A$-module $S$. 
[This terminology is consistent with that used
in other contexts -- $A$ is split
just in case the reductive quotient of the "unit group" $A^\times$ is a split reductive algebraic group over $k$.]
Suppose that $k$ is perfect and that $A_\ell = A \otimes_k \ell$ is a split $\ell$-algebra for a finite, separable extension $\ell \supset k$. Then we have the following:

$(*)$ If $S$ is a simple $A$-module, the center $Z$ of the division $k$-algebra $\operatorname{End}_A(S)$ is a subfield of $\ell$.

To see this, I claim first that $\operatorname{End}_A(S) \otimes_k \ell$ is a split semisimple
$\ell$-algebra. Indeed, since $k \subset \ell$ is separable, the $A_\ell$-module $S \otimes_k \ell = S_\ell$ is semisimple, say $S_\ell = \bigoplus_i S_i$ as $A_\ell$-module, where $S_i$ is the $T_i$-isotypic
component of $S_\ell$ and where $T_i$ are distinct simple $A_\ell$-modules. Since
by assumption $\operatorname{End}_{A_\ell}(T_i) = \ell$, we see
that $$\operatorname{End}_A(S) \otimes_k \ell \simeq \operatorname{End}_{A_\ell}(S_\ell) = \prod_i \operatorname{End}_{A_\ell}(S_i)$$
is a product of full matrix algebras over $\ell$. Now observe that the center of a split semisimple $\ell$-algebra
is a  a split commutative etale $\ell$-algbra $\ell \times \cdots \times \ell$. Assertion $(*)$
now follows.
Apply this to $A = kG$ for a finite group $G$. By Torsten's comment (following Emerton's answer) we may suppose $k$ to be perfect. 
Then $A \otimes_k \ell$ is split
for an Abelian extension $\ell$ of $k$ -- a suitable $\ell$ can be obtained by adjoining to $k$ enough roots of unity. It follows that $Z$ is always Galois over $k$ (for $A = kG$).
