1
$\begingroup$

Given a fiber bundle $\pi:E\to M$, a curve $\gamma:[0,1]\to M$, and a point $p \in \pi^{-1}(\gamma(0))$, a connection on the bundle allows us to uniquely lift $\gamma$ to a horizontal curve in E through $p$. In almost all situations I have encountered, the horizontal lift does not depend on the orientation of $\gamma$. To be precise, the two curves $t\to \gamma(t)$ and $t\to\gamma(1-t)$ have the same horizontal lift through $p$.

I have a fiber bundle for which I would like to have a type of parallel transport which depends on which direction one is moving in the base. So my question is: what is the best way to formulate a connection which is orientation dependent, and so enables this type of parallel transport?

Improve this question
$\endgroup$
3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Given a curve $\gamma$ on $M$ and fixing a point $x$ in fibre of $\gamma(0)$, there exists a curve that starts at $x$. So, lift has starting point as $x$. Suppose you choose $t\mapsto \gamma(1-t)$, you fix a point $y$ in fibre of $\gamma(1)=\gamma(1-0)$, you get a lift whose starting point is $y$. This does not say horizantal lift of $\gamma(t)$ and $\gamma(1-t)$ are same if you are looking from orientation perspective. What is that I am misunderstanding in your question? $\endgroup$
    – Praphulla Koushik
    Commented Jan 31, 2019 at 8:05
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I agree with @PraphullaKoushik. Simply put: he lifts of the two curves $t\mapsto \gamma(t)$ and $t\mapsto \gamma(1-t)$ are not the same (their images are), so the usual lift is already orientation dependent. $\endgroup$
    – Michael Bächtold
    Commented Feb 2, 2019 at 8:19
  • $\begingroup$ I had written that as an answer and then I was not sure as question is not clear.. so deleted my answer... So, left it as a comment... $\endgroup$
    – Praphulla Koushik
    Commented Feb 2, 2019 at 9:44

2 Answers 2

Reset to default
2
$\begingroup$

If you look at the Ehresmann connection in T(TM) (or T(TM\0)) associated with a second order differential equation or a Finsler metric (which is not necessarily reversible), then this is orientation dependent. This is not a fancy notion, just a straight-forward generalization (or just geometrization) of the Levi-Civita connection for Riemannian metrics, when you interpret it as an Ehresmann connection: https://mathoverflow.net/a/256484/21123

Related to these connections in $TM$ (or $PTM$, $STM$) is the notion of non-linear connection and that may be what you are looking for. Instead of decomposing $T_eE$ at every point into the vertical subspace $V_eE$ and a horizontal subspace $H_eE$ you decompose it into $V_eE$ and a cone in $T_eE$ such that at each non-zero point of the cone the vertical subspace and the tangent to the cone form a linear decomposition of $T_eE$. The cone is not necessarily symmetric about the origin and you can capture non-reversibility in this way.

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ How does this not violate Picard–Lindelöf theorem? $\endgroup$
    – Vít Tuček
    Commented Jan 31, 2019 at 10:38
  • $\begingroup$ Because the initial conditions for a geodesic and for the one with its orientation reversed are not the same. $\endgroup$
    – alvarezpaiva
    Commented Jan 31, 2019 at 13:25
  • $\begingroup$ It IS cheating: the connection is not on a bundle over M (but over TM). If not, it is impossible with anything that could be described as an Ehresman connection: a horizontal curve remains horizontal in whatever reparametrization. $\endgroup$
    – alvarezpaiva
    Commented Jan 31, 2019 at 13:28
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I see. That's along the lines I was thinking. So perhaps in general one could try connection on $J^1E$? $\endgroup$
    – Vít Tuček
    Commented Jan 31, 2019 at 14:27
  • $\begingroup$ I am sure I am misunderstanding something in the question... I was thinking "Given a curve $\gamma$ on $M$ and fixing a point $x$ in fibre of $\gamma(0)$, there exists a curve that starts at $x$. So, lift has starting point as $x$. Suppose you choose $t\mapsto \gamma(1-t)$, you fix a point $y$ in fibre of $\gamma(1)=\gamma(1-0)$, you get a lift whose starting point is $y$. This does not say horizantal lift of $\gamma(t)$ and $\gamma(1-t)$ are same if you are looking from orientation perspective." Can you (if possible) tell me what I am misunderstanding $\endgroup$
    – Praphulla Koushik
    Commented Jan 31, 2019 at 15:51
0
$\begingroup$

Given a curve $\gamma$ on $M$ and fixing a point $x$ in the fibre of $\gamma(0)$, there exists a curve that starts at $x$. So, this lift has starting point as $x$. Suppose you choose $t\mapsto \gamma(1-t)$, you fix a point $y$ in the fibre of $\gamma(1)=\gamma(1-0)$, you get a lift whose starting point is $y$. This does not say horizontal lift of $\gamma(t)$ and $\gamma(1-t)$ are same if you are looking from orientation perspective.

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.