10
$\begingroup$

Gauge theories are traditionally formulated in space-time, superspace, manifolds, or supermanifolds.

Are there formulations of gauge theory in the context of algebraic geometry (e.g. defining fields on affine varieties, schemes, or stacks)?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ For instance, one particularly algebraic approach for manifolds (which could be promptly applied to schemes) is given in [Section 2.3, DEF$^+$99], where a Lagrangian on a manifold is defined as an element of a particular double chain complex (which is a subcomplex of a complex that is very similar to the de Rham complex of $\mathcal{F}\times M$, with $\mathcal{F}$ the space of fields (see there) on $M$). $\endgroup$ – Théo de Oliveira Santos Jan 22 at 17:38
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ This is a tangent but why gauge theory on schemes? $\endgroup$ – AlexArvanitakis Jan 22 at 18:52
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @AlexArvanitakis I don't have a particular objective in mind, but I think it might lead to interesting algebraic results, as gauge theory on manifolds has lead to (for example) Donaldson invariants. Also, it might be a natural way to study supersymmetry: in an affine scheme, nilpotents are elements of the underlying ring (also seem as functions on the scheme), whereas the sheaf of superspace $\mathbb{R}^{p|q}$ is the freely generated sheaf $\mathscr{C}^\infty[\theta^1,\dots,\theta^q]$ by nilpotent... $\endgroup$ – Théo de Oliveira Santos Jan 22 at 19:30
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ ...generators $\theta^1,\dots,\theta^q$ of the sheaf $\mathscr{C}^\infty$ of smooth real-valued functions on ordinary space. That is, schemes include nilpotents by themselves, while superspace adds them a bit artificially. $\endgroup$ – Théo de Oliveira Santos Jan 22 at 19:30
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ fair enough. I was really looking for context that would jog my memory... You could look into papers by Eric Sharpe e.g. the notes arxiv.org/pdf/hep-th/0307245.pdf $\endgroup$ – AlexArvanitakis Jan 22 at 19:40
3
$\begingroup$

Gauge Theory on $C^\infty$-(Super)schemes:

Chien-Hao Liu and Shing-Tung Yau have investigated this question (see [1] and [2]) in the context of (super) $C^\infty$-algebraic geometry.

(Super) $C^\infty$-algebraic geometry is a generalization of algebraic geometry in which rings are substituted by ($\mathbb{Z}/2$-graded) $C^\infty$-rings, defined as $\mathbb{R}$-algebras having all smooth functions as operations, instead of just the ordinary algebra ones. It was introduced by Dominic Joyce in [3]. (See [4] and [5] for surveys and [6] for further development.)

More specifically, Liu and Yau construct in [1, Section 1.2] a $C^\infty$-superscheme $\widehat{X}=(X,\widehat{\mathscr{O}}_X)$, called the $d=4$, $\mathcal{N}=1$ superspace. In [2], they extend this construction and introduce the concept of towered superspace $\widehat{X}^\widehat{\boxplus}$, which is a $C^\infty$-superscheme. From $\widehat{X}^\widehat{\boxplus}$, the authors construct another $C^\infty$-superscheme $X^\mathrm{physics}$. Finally, they define two quantum field theories on $X^\mathrm{physics}$, which are analogues of the Wess-Zumino model and supersymmetric $\mathrm{U}(1)$ gauge theory with matter.


References

[1] Chien-Hao Liu and Shing-Tung Yau. $N=1$ fermionic D3-branes in RNS formulation I. $C^\infty$-Algebrogeometric foundations of $d=4,N=1$ supersymmetry, SUSY-rep compatible hybrid connections, and $\widehat{D}$-chiral maps from a $d=4$ $N=1$ Azumaya/matrix superspace. arXiv:1808.05011 [math.DG]

[2] Chien-Hao Liu and Shing-Tung Yau. Physicists' $d=3+1$, $N=1$ superspace-time and supersymmetric QFTs from a tower construction in complexified $\mathbb{Z}/2$-graded $C^\infty$-Algebraic Geometry and a purge-evaluation/index-contracting map. arXiv:1902.06246 [hep-th]

[3] Algebraic Geometry over $C^\infty$-rings, Dominic Joyce. arXiv:1001.0023 [math.AG]

[4] An introduction to C-infinity schemes and C-infinity algebraic geometry, Dominic Joyce. arXiv:1001.0023 [math.AG]

[5] $C^\infty$-Algebraic Geometry, Elana Kalashnikov. Available at https://people.maths.ox.ac.uk/joyce/theses/KalashnikovMSc.pdf.

[6] D-manifolds and d-orbifolds: a theory of derived differential geometry, Dominic Joyce. Available at https://people.maths.ox.ac.uk/joyce/dmanifolds.html.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ (Since I am not familiar with their work, this answer is probably only a decorated pointer to the literature. (At best!)) $\endgroup$ – Théo de Oliveira Santos Feb 19 at 20:34

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.