3
$\begingroup$

Let $f:\mathbb{R}_+\to\mathbb{R}_+$ be an Orlicz function, or sometimes referred to as an Young function, i.e. it is a convex, non-decreasing function such that $f(0)=0$. I am trying to study the convexity of the function $\phi:\mathbb{R}^n\to\mathbb{R}$, such that $\phi(\mathbf{x})=f^{-1}\left(\frac{1}{s}\sum_{j=1}^s f(|{x}_j|)\right)$. Note that when $f(x)=|x|^p,\ p\ge 1$, then $\phi(\mathbf{x})=\frac{\|\mathbf{x}\|_p}{s^{1/p}}$, which is a convex function. Similarly, a bit of calculation shows that the function $\phi$ is also convex when $f(x)=e^{ax}-1$ for any $a>0$. So intuitively I thought that this result might hold for all Orlicz functions $f$. However, I have not been able to prove this result, and in fact, I think this does not hold for many functions, for example, $f(x)=e^{x^2}-1$. Then, I am left with the investigation of such Orlicz functions $f$, that make the corresponding $\phi$ convex. However, assuming that $f$ is double differentiable, the Hessian of $\phi$ is turning out to be too difficult to analyze. At this point, I am not sure how to proceed to find the properties of $f$ that make $\phi$ convex. Can anyone kindly suggest some ideas, or point me to some relevant references that can help me proceed in this investigation? Thanks in advance.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It is convex if in addition $f’/f’’$ is concave. I think this is also if and only if. There is a theorem of Hardy—Littlewood—Polya which says that if $F’>0, F’’>0$ and $F’/F’’$ is concave then the functional $h \mapsto F^{-1}(\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}} F(h)d\mu)$ is convex on the set of all nonnegative functions h. Here $d\mu$ is an arbitrary probability measure on $\mathbb{R}^{n}$. Now you just need to choose piecewise constant functions h to get the convexity $\endgroup$ – Paata Ivanishvili Jan 20 '19 at 21:32
  • $\begingroup$ @PaataIvanishvili, thanks! this is a big help for me. Can you also kindly mention the name of the theorem so that I can get more familiarized with it? $\endgroup$ – Samrat Mukhopadhyay Jan 21 '19 at 6:13
  • $\begingroup$ I decided to post the full answer. I am sorry that I did not write all the details in my previous comment. I was in a grocery store, I was typing through my iPhone, and it was almost impossible to write everything. $\endgroup$ – Paata Ivanishvili Jan 21 '19 at 17:12
  • $\begingroup$ I am so glad that you wrote this full answer. This is a huge help. Thanks! $\endgroup$ – Samrat Mukhopadhyay Jan 22 '19 at 6:44
2
$\begingroup$

It follows from Hardy--Littlewood--Polya (see section 3.16, page 86), that if for $x>0$ we have $f, f', f''>0$, and $f'/f''$ is concave, and $d\mu$ is a probability measure on the probability space $\Omega$, then the functional

$$ h \mapsto f^{-1}\left(\int_{\Omega} f(h(\omega)) d\mu(\omega) \right) \qquad (*) $$ is convex on the set of nonnegative functions $h :\Omega \to \mathbb{R}_{+}$. In fact these is "if and only if" characterization (see the reference for the details).

Now to obtain the convexity that you are looking for, consider $\Omega = [0,1]$, and let $d\mu = dx$ be a standard Lebesgue measure on $[0,1]$. Next, partition $[0,1]$ into $s$ subintervals $I_{1}, \ldots, I_{s}$ of equal length $\frac{1}{s}$. Given $p=(p_{1}, \ldots, p_{s}) \in \mathbb{R}^{s}$, define $h_{p}(x) =|p_{j}|$ if $s \in I_{j}$. Next, let $q = (q_{1}, \ldots, q_{s})\in \mathbb{R}^{s}$. Then convexity of the functional (*) means $$ f^{-1}\left(\int_{0}^{1} f\left(\frac{h_{p}(x)+h_{q}(x)}{2}\right)dx \right) \leq \frac{1}{2}\left(f^{-1}\left(\int_{0}^{1} f\left(h_{p}(x)\right)dx \right)+f^{-1}\left(\int_{0}^{1} f\left(h_{q}(x)\right)dx \right) \right). $$ On the other hand we have $$ f^{-1}\left(\int_{0}^{1} f\left(h_{p}(x)\right)dx \right) = f^{-1}\left(\frac{1}{s}\sum_{1\leq j \leq s} f(|p_{j}|) \right)\\ f^{-1}\left(\int_{0}^{1} f\left(h_{q}(x)\right)dx \right) = f^{-1}\left(\frac{1}{s}\sum_{1\leq j \leq s} f(|q_{j}|) \right)\\ $$ and $$ f^{-1}\left(\int_{0}^{1} f\left(\frac{h_{p}(x)+h_{q}(x)}{2}\right)dx \right) = f^{-1}\left(\frac{1}{s}\sum_{1\leq j \leq s} f\left(\frac{|p_{j}|+|q_{j}|}{2}\right) \right) \geq f^{-1}\left(\frac{1}{s}\sum_{1\leq j \leq s} f\left(\frac{|p_{j}+q_{j}|}{2}\right) \right) $$ where the last inequality follows because $|a+b|\leq |a|+|b|$, and $f, f^{-1}$ are strictly increasing.

Hardy--Littlewood--Polya PDF

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks a lot for the answer! $\endgroup$ – Samrat Mukhopadhyay Jan 22 '19 at 6:46

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.