14
$\begingroup$

Let $G\subset \mathrm{SU}(2)$ be a finite group. (These are famously classified through the McKay correspondence.) The Lie group framing of $\mathrm{SU}(2) = S^3$ descends to the quotient manifold $S^3 / G$, at least after getting some "left"s and "right"s in the correct places.

Every framed $k$-manifold determines a class in the $k$th stable homotopy group of spheres $\pi_k(\text{Sphere})$. For example, $\mathrm{SU}(2)$ with its Lie group framing provides a generator of $\pi_3(\text{Sphere}) = \mathbb{Z}/24$.

What are the values of the homotopy-group classes determined by the framed 3-manifolds $S^3/G$? How do these values relate to other Lie theoretic data like the rank or (dual) Coxeter number of the ADE Dynkin diagram?

$\endgroup$
  • 7
    $\begingroup$ The finite subgoups of $\operatorname{SU}(2) $ have been classified by Felix Klein, slightly before McKay... $\endgroup$ – abx Jan 12 at 5:33
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @abx Thanks for the correction. I hadn't meant that the classification was due to McKay, only that I wanted to remind that it is convenient to sort them in terms of ADE data. $\endgroup$ – Theo Johnson-Freyd Jan 12 at 5:36
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Sorry to be pedantic again, but the correspondence in terms of ADE goes back (at least) to P. Duval (around 1930). $\endgroup$ – abx Jan 12 at 7:14
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @abx Good to know. It is a fairly common phenomenon that mathematics is not named after its inventor... $\endgroup$ – Theo Johnson-Freyd Jan 12 at 15:32
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @aglearner It is the type of fact I sort of grew up with. In deed, the statement is that the group $\Omega_k^{fr}$ of stably-framed $k$-manifolds up to stably-framed cobordism is isomorphic to the stable homotopy group $\pi_k^s$ of spheres. In his answer below, Alex Suciu cites a paper of Seade and Steer, which calls the map $\Omega_k^{fr} \to \pi_k^s$ the "Pontryagin construction" and cites Milnor's book Topology from the differential viewpoint. $\endgroup$ – Theo Johnson-Freyd Jan 12 at 15:38
16
$\begingroup$

The answer can be found in Theorem 2.1 from a paper of José Seade and Brian Steer (Complex singularities and the framed cobordism class of compact quotients of $3$-dimensional Lie groups by discrete subgroups, Comment. Math. Helv. 65 (1990), no. 3, 349–374, available here): If $G$ is the cyclic group of order $r$, then $S^3/G$ represents $r$ times a generator of $\pi_3^s=\mathbb{Z}/24\mathbb{Z}$, whereas if $G$ is the $\langle p,q,r\rangle$ triangle group, then $S^3/G$ represents $(p+q+r-1)$ times a generator of $\pi_3^s$.

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ If I am not mistaken, this number $r$ or $(p+q+r-1)$ is the number of complex irreps of $G$, which in terms of the ADE classification is one more than the rank of the compact Dynkin diagram. $\endgroup$ – Theo Johnson-Freyd Jan 12 at 15:41
  • $\begingroup$ Quick reality check: Take $G=I^*$ (the binary icosahedral group of order 120), so that $S^3/G=\Sigma(2,3,5)$ is the Poincaré homology sphere. Then the corresponding Dynkin diagram is $E_8$, and $2+3+5-1=9=8+1$. Yep, that works. $\endgroup$ – Alex Suciu Jan 12 at 20:38
  • $\begingroup$ Incidentally, the reason I wanted to say things in terms of the Dynkin diagram is that there is a moonshine-type construction that takes in certain Dynkin data and produces certain modular objects, and which might, in some yet-to-be understood way, factor through some geometric objects e.g. 3-manifolds. I had hoped to go (Dynkin data) -> (S^3/G) -> (modular object), but this seems not to work, or at least I need to think more. $\endgroup$ – Theo Johnson-Freyd Jan 13 at 0:30

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.