1
$\begingroup$

I am applying the Feynman-Kac theory for solving a PDE with boundary conditions.

For the SDE simulation I use the Euler-approximation, which introduces a time-step $h$ for the Brownian Motion, and since the PDE has some boundary conditions, we need to compute its hitting time $\tau$.

Numerically speaking, I start with $\tau = 0$ and increase it progressively.

So at each step:

  • the process position is increased by a normal depending (also) on $h$ (the SDE);
  • the variable $\tau$ is increased by some $k$;
  • the hitting condition is checked.

My question is: is there a specific connection between $h$ and $k$? Below my reasoning.

EDIT: I am adding more details with the hope of expressing better my question.

Consider the 1-dimensional heat on $[0,1]$, $u_t = u_{xx}$ with zero boundary conditions. So $u_0$ a known initial state, and $v(t,0)=v(t,1)=0$ for each time. Suppose we want to compute the solution at time $T=0.05$.

The stopping time to insert into Feynman-Kac expectation is:

$ \tau = \inf \{ k \geq 0 : T-k \leq 0,$ or $X_s\geq 1$, or $X_s \leq 0 \} $

where with $X_t$ solves $dX_t = \sqrt{2} {dB}_t$.

I approximate the SDE say with a time-step $h=0.01$, so if we start from $x \in [0,1]$ (point on which we are going to compute the PDE solution) and set $k=0$ (hitting time approximation), at every step we:

  1. move by adding a normal $N(0, 2h)$
  2. increase $k$ by $\sqrt{h}$

Again: when (1) goes to 0 or 1, or $T - k$ goes to 0, the hit is considered done.

Now, (1) works great: the process take its time for hitting the boundary. Conversely, since $\sqrt(0.01)=0.1$, $T - \sqrt{h} = 0.05-0.1 = -0.05$ so the boundary is immediately hit!

As a result, in the simulation the boundary is hit always after one step and I obtain just a small shift of my initial condition $u_0$.

If, conversely, in (2) I subtract something like $h^{1.8}$, rather than $\sqrt{h}$, the results are pretty nice...

$\endgroup$

This question has an open bounty worth +50 reputation from user233650 ending in 3 days.

Looking for an answer drawing from credible and/or official sources.

1
$\begingroup$

Computing Exit Times with the Euler Scheme by F. Buchmann addresses this problem in detail.

For a random walk with position $x_{k+1}=x_k+\delta x_k$, incremented by a normally distributed stochastic variable $\delta x_k$ with variance $h$, the simplest hitting time estimate is $\tau=Kh$ with $K$ the smallest $k$ such that $x_k$ is outside of the boundary. This is an overestimate, because it is possible that both $x_k$ and $x_{k+1}$ are inside of the boundary, and yet the Brownian motion crossed the boundary between times $kh$ and $(k+1)h$. Buchmann constructs interpolants that test for this intermediate excursion.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you so much Carlo, paper just printed. Meanwhile, more details are now available in my question in order to make my "results" reproducible. $\endgroup$ – user233650 2 days ago

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.