-2
$\begingroup$

In section 2.4.4 of Lurie's Higher Topos Theory, it is said multiple times that using

Proposition: Let $p : \mathcal{C} \rightarrow \mathcal{D}$ be an inner fibration of $\infty$-categories. Let $x,y$ be vertices of $\mathcal{C}$, let $\tilde{e} : p(x) \rightarrow p(y)$ be an edge of $\mathcal{D}$ and let $ e: x'\rightarrow y$ be a locally $p$-Cartesian edge of $\mathcal{C}$ lifting $\tilde{f}$. Then in the homotopy category $\mathcal{H}$ of spaces there is a fiber sequence $$ Map_{\mathcal{C}_{p(x)}}(x,x') \rightarrow Map_{\mathcal{C}}(x,y) \rightarrow Map_{\mathcal{D}}(p(x),p(y))$$ where the fiber is taken over $\tilde{e}$.

we have that any cartesian fibration of simplicial set $p :\mathcal{C} \rightarrow \mathcal{D}$ is fully faithful map in the sense that for every vertices $x,y \in \mathcal{C}$, the induced map $$Map_{\mathcal{C}}(x,y) \rightarrow Map_{\mathcal{D}}(p(x),p(y))$$ is a Kan weak equivalence of simplicial sets.

I see that from the fact that $p$ is a Cartesian fibration we have that $p$ satisfies the hypothesis of the above proposition. However I do not see how we can say that $p$ is fully faithful from it.

$\endgroup$
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ He never makes that claim, and it’s not true (map a big simplicial set to a point). In each instance there are further properties assumed of p to ensure that fiber from 2.4.4.2 is zero, or the proposition is used in a different way. For example, in 2.4.4.4, we have a map between two loc Cartesian fibrations and it is assumed that the map preserves loc Cartesian edges and is a fiberwise equivalence- that tells you the map on fibers in 2.4.4.4 is an equivalence, and the map on bases is the identity, so the map in the middle is an equivalence. $\endgroup$ – Dylan Wilson Jan 2 at 14:54
  • $\begingroup$ Is there a specific use of 2.4.4.2 that you’re interested in? $\endgroup$ – Dylan Wilson Jan 2 at 14:54
  • $\begingroup$ I am mostly interested of its use in 2.4.4.5. I maybe should have written $\infty$-categories instead of simplicial sets. $\endgroup$ – Oscar P. Jan 2 at 15:04
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ But it’s still false then- for example the map from Delta^1 to a point is a Cartesian fibration that is not fully faithful. In 2.4.4.5, the square with C’,C,D, and D’ induces a map of fiber sequences from 2.4.4.2. The map on bases is an equivalence bc D’—>D is assumed to be a categorical equivalence. The map on fibers is an isomorphism since C’ is the literal pullback. So the map in the middle is a weak equivalence, whence the claim about C’—>C being fully faithful. $\endgroup$ – Dylan Wilson Jan 2 at 15:20
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ That’s exactly the content of the two sentences I wrote preceding “So the map in the middle is a weak equivalence.” $\endgroup$ – Dylan Wilson Jan 2 at 16:29

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.