-1
$\begingroup$

Let $\zeta$ denote the Riemann zeta function. In this answer: https://mathoverflow.net/a/314066/133634, @Paul Garret considers the representation

$$\frac{\zeta(s)}{s} = \int_1^\infty (\sum_{1 \le n \le x} 1) x^{-s-1}dx$$ for $\Re(s)>1$, and then claims (without proof) that this representation yields

$$\frac{\zeta(s)}{s}+\frac{\zeta(s)}{1-s}= \int_0^\infty ((\sum_{1 \le n \le x} 1-x)-x(\sum_{1 \le n \le x} \frac1n-\log x-\gamma)) x^{-s-1}dx$$ for $\Re(s)\in(0,1)$, where $\gamma$ is the Euler constant.

But i can't see how the second representation follows from the first. Can anyone please explain ?

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Actually, it was @reuns who composed that answer. The derivation is pretty standard, in any case. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 19, 2018 at 22:45
  • $\begingroup$ @Paul Garret, any reference of the ''pretty standard'' derivation ? $\endgroup$
    – OneTwoOne
    Commented Dec 19, 2018 at 23:11
  • $\begingroup$ And it seems to me that reuns'representation is for $\frac{\zeta(s+1)}{s}$, for an unspecified radius of convergence. $\endgroup$
    – OneTwoOne
    Commented Dec 19, 2018 at 23:36
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Titchmarsh? Edwards' book? Patterson's? Iwaniec'? Iwaniec-Kowalski? Karatsuba-Voronin? Ivic? Even Whittaker-and-Watson? I'd bet a dollar that most of these, if not all, include elementary relations like the above. The only thing that might be not entirely elementary is that the Euler-Mascheroni constant does give the constant in the asymptotics of the harmonic sum...? $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 20, 2018 at 0:02

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

Let $0<\Re(s)<1$ unless otherwise indicated. Then $$\int_0^\infty (\sum_{1 \le n \le x} 1-x) x^{-s-1}\,dx=-\int_0^1 x^{-s}+\int_1^\infty (\sum_{1 \le n \le x} 1-x) x^{-s-1}\,dx.$$ On the right hand side, the first integral equals $1/(s-1)$. The second integral equals $\zeta(s)/s-1/(s-1)$ as can be seen by proving it first for $\Re(s)>1$ and then continuing it analytically to $\Re(s)>0$. Hence $$\int_0^\infty (\sum_{1 \le n \le x} 1-x) x^{-s-1}\,dx=\frac{\zeta(s)}{s},\qquad 0<\Re(s)<1.\tag{1}$$ Now consider $$S(x):=\sum_{1 \le n \le x} \frac1n-\log x-\gamma,\qquad x>0.$$ Note that $S(x)\ll\log x$ when $x<1$, and $S(x)\ll 1/x$ when $x\geq 1$. Then, the remaining part of the integral is, by integration by parts, $$\int_0^\infty S(x)x^{-s}\,dx=\frac{1}{s-1}\int_0^\infty x^{1-s}\,dS(x).$$ Now we argue for the integral on the right hand side similarly as before: $$\int_0^\infty x^{1-s}\,dS(x)=\int_0^{1-} x^{1-s}\,dS(x)+\int_{1-}^\infty x^{1-s}\,dS(x).$$ On the right hand side, the first integral equals $1/(s-1)$. The second integral equals $\zeta(s)-1/(s-1)$ as can be seen by proving it first for $\Re(s)>1$ and then continuing it analytically to $\Re(s)>0$. Hence $$\int_0^\infty x^{1-s}\,dS(x)=\zeta(s),\qquad 0<\Re(s)<1,$$ and therefore $$\int_0^\infty S(x)x^{-s}\,dx=\frac{\zeta(s)}{s-1},\qquad 0<\Re(s)<1.\tag{2}$$ Subtracting $(2)$ from $(1)$, the claimed identity follows.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .