6
$\begingroup$

It is well-known that if $V[G]$ is a generic extension by adding a Cohen real, then the set $\{r \in V[G]: r$ is Cohen generic over $V\}$ has measure zero.

On the other hand, if $V[G]$ is a generic extension by adding a random real, then the set $\{r \in V[G]: r$ is random over $V\}$ has outer measure one.

Question. I am wondering what is know about other generic reals? Are there any cases where the answer for them is not known?

Please provide references or proofs for each case.

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Since a Mathias real (viewed as a subset of $\omega$) has asymptotic density $0$, the set of Mathias reals in any forcing extension will have measure $0$. The same trivial observation will handle some other cases of your question, but I'll be interested to see nontrivial information. $\endgroup$ – Andreas Blass Dec 13 '18 at 15:43
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Another observation: If $g$ is a Sacks real over $V$, then the set of Sacks reals in $V[g]$ cannot have measure $0$. This is because every real in $S = \mathbb R^{V[g]} \setminus \mathbb R^V$ is a Sacks real, so if $S$ were null then $S \cup (S+g)$ would be too; however, $S \cup (S+g) = \mathbb R^{V[g]}$. Because $S$ is closed under rational translations, its being non-null implies it has full outer measure. My guess would be that $\mathbb R^V$ is null in $V[g]$, but I'm not sure right now. $\endgroup$ – Will Brian Dec 13 '18 at 21:44
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Actually, now that I think about it, I think that both $S$ and its complement should have full outer measure. The reason is that if $\mathbb R^V$ were null in $V[g]$, then iterating the Sacks forcing (in the usual way -- length $\omega_2$, countable supports) would produce a model where, e.g., every non-measurable set has size $\aleph_2$. This doesn't happen, so adding a Sacks real can't make the ground model reals null. So I guess this shows that after adding a Sacks real, the set of Sacks reals is non-measurable with full outer measure. $\endgroup$ – Will Brian Dec 13 '18 at 21:50
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Let $I$ be a $\sigma$-ideal on the reals and suppose that there is $X\in I$ and a Lebesgue null set $Y$ such that $X\cup Y$ is a partition of the reals (such as the case when $I$ is the meager ideal), then every $\mathbb{P}_I$ generic real must be in $Y$, hence the set of $\mathbb{P}_I$-generic reals has measure zero. My guess is that the above condition should be equivalent to "the set of $\mathbb{P}_I$-generics is null", but I haven't thought about this carefully. $\endgroup$ – Haim Dec 13 '18 at 22:30
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ If $r$ is random, then in $L[r]$, the set of random reals is not measureable $\endgroup$ – 喻 良 Dec 13 '18 at 23:22

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.