8
$\begingroup$

For $n\in\mathbb{N}$ and $m=\lfloor\frac{n}2\rfloor$, consider the $n\times n$ skew-symmetric matrix $A_n$ where each entry in the first $m$ sub-diagonals below the main diagonal is $1$ and each of the remaining entries below the main diagonal is $-1$. Let $I_n$ be the $n\times n$ identity matrix.

Next, construct the matrix $M_n=A_n+xI_n$. For example, we have $$M_3=\begin{pmatrix} x&-1&1 \\ 1&x&-1 \\ -1&1&x \end{pmatrix} \qquad \text{and} \qquad M_4=\begin{pmatrix} x&-1&-1&1 \\ 1&x&-1&-1 \\ 1&1&x&-1 \\ -1&1&1&x \end{pmatrix}.$$

QUESTION. Is the following true? Experiments suggest to be so. $$\det(M_n)=\sum_{k=0}^m\binom{n}{2k}x^{n-2k}.$$

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Do you mean $A_n + x I_n$? $\endgroup$ Dec 12, 2018 at 8:36
  • $\begingroup$ wouldn't $$\det(M_n)=\sum_{k=0}^m e_{n-2k}(x_1,\dots,x_n)$$ be easier? $\endgroup$ Dec 12, 2018 at 9:56
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The coefficient of $x^{n-m}$ is the sum of determinants of $m \times m$ principal submatrices of $A_n$. These are skew-symmetric, so have determinant zero when $m$ is odd. When $m=2k$ is even, such a determinant is a square of a Pfaffian, which (roughly speaking) counts weighted perfect matchings of, well, a size $2k$ subgraph of the oriented complete graph with oriented adjacency matrix $A_n$. I wonder if there is any combinatorial way to get $\binom{n}{2k}$ as the total of those squares of counts* of weighted matchings (*but they are not really counts, there are signs...). $\endgroup$ Dec 12, 2018 at 23:15

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

For $n$ odd, $M_n$ is an $n\times n$ circulant matrix, and so Theorem 17 in Krattenthaler's marvellous text applies. Denoting by $w$ a primitive $n$th root of unity, it gives $$\det M_n=\prod_{i=0}^{n-1} (x-w^i-w^{2i}-\dots -w^{mi}+w^{(m+1)i}+\dots +w^{(n-1)i}),$$ something that should not be hard to simplify.

For $n$ even, you still have a special Hankel matrix, for which again there are general methods in [loc.cit.].

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ For even $n$, there is an extension of circulant matrices sometimes called $\alpha$-circulant that should do the job; basically you can multiply the sub-diagonal entries by a certain complex number $\alpha$. In this case I guess that the same formula holds, but with $w$ a root of $-1$ instead of $1$. $\endgroup$ Dec 12, 2018 at 10:58

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.