3
$\begingroup$

Let $\mathcal{C}$ be an abelian category and $\mathcal{S}$ be a full subcategory of $\mathcal{C}$. We call $\mathcal{S}$ a Serre subcategory of $\mathcal{C}$ if $\mathcal{S}$ is closed under forming subobjects, quotients, and extensions. For a Serre subcategory $\mathcal{S}$ we could form the quotien category $\mathcal{C}/\mathcal{S}$ and have the quotient functor $p: \mathcal{C}\to \mathcal{C}/\mathcal{S}$, which is obviously exact.

We call $\mathcal{S}$ a localizing Serre subcategory of $\mathcal{C}$ if the quotient functor $p: \mathcal{C}\to \mathcal{C}/\mathcal{S}$ has a right adjoint: $s: \mathcal{C}/\mathcal{S}\to \mathcal{C}$. In this case we could prove that $ps$ is isomorphic to the identity functor. In particular $s: \mathcal{C}/\mathcal{S}\to \mathcal{C}$ is an embedding hence $\mathcal{C}/\mathcal{S}$ is equivalent to a full subcategory $\mathcal{L}$ of $\mathcal{C}$. Actually $\mathcal{L}$ is the right orthogonal complement of $\mathcal{S}$.

Similarly we call a full subcategory $\mathcal{L}$ of an abelian category $\mathcal{C}$ a strict localization if the inclusion functor $i: \mathcal{L}\to \mathcal{C}$ has an exact left adjoint $a: \mathcal{C}\to \mathcal{L}$. Notice that in general the inclusion $i: \mathcal{L}\to \mathcal{C}$ is not an exact functor.

In the case that $\mathcal{C}$ is a Grothendieck category, we know that a Serre subcategory $\mathcal{S}$ of $\mathcal{C}$ is localizing if and only if $\mathcal{S}$ is closed under arbitrary direct sums. See this paper, Proposition 2.5.

My question is: When $\mathcal{C}$ is a Grothendieck category, do we have an explicit criterion on what kind of full subcategory $\mathcal{L}$ of $\mathcal{C}$ is a strict localization?

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.